User talk:Kokoon

Welcome to Wikipedia
Mushroom (Talk) 20:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Autechre.ws Broadcast - 02-03-2010
A tag has been placed on Autechre.ws Broadcast - 02-03-2010 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 21:42, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I have deleted the page. If you would like a copy restored to your userspace so that you can work on it and try to establish notability, using independent, reliable sources, please place a note requesting restoration on User talk:DESiegel, at the bottom of the page, and I will do so when I have a chance. Or you may instead ask any one of these administrators, who have indicated a willingness to fulfill such requests.DES (talk) 22:27, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note also that Wikipedia is not a publisher of original research. You wrote on Talk:Autechre.ws Broadcast - 02-03-2010 "12 hours of a radio broadcast mix and we're trying to identify the tracks. the goal is to assemble the complete tracklist. the rip we're referring to is the 710MB mono mp3 that lasts 740 minutes and 8 seconds." Parsing a multi-hour braodcast into tracks is quite possibly original research. If the results were published in a reliable source, then, and probably only then, could Wikipedia report them. DES (talk) 22:31, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Autechre.ws Broadcast - 02-03-2010. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. This is exactly the sort of work that ought to be done, if at all on Wikipedia, in userspace until it is ready to distribute, which includes some indication of notability DES (talk) 22:26, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Ordinal suffixes
Hello Kokoon, thanx for your work and please look at this:
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ulver&action=historysubmit&diff=447874653&oldid=444154804
 * Ordinals
 * w:Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers

The superscript of the most common text fonts and computer systems is not the same as the traditional typography for ordinal suffixes. The superscript breakes the text-line far and ugly to next upper text-line. And the source code is wasted by sup/sup. The suffixes are a unneccesary source for errors like 14st August.--Diwas (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)