User talk:Kolchak1923

Mussolini Signature
Hey, I've already completed this. How does this look? Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 14:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC) Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 04:21, 19 May 2010 (UTC) I'll get to it during the weekend. Sorry, I've been behind. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 00:22, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I've been pretty busy, yet again. I'll get to it soon.  Connormah  talk 01:17, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

SVG
Дорогой друг! Я не очень хорошо векторной графики художника. Я часто использую автоматизированного преобразовать в SVG. (К сожалению, я не знаю русский. Это сообщение было написано с использованием Google Translate) --JovianEye (talk) 17:23, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Fascist Union of Youth
I have done the copyedit to the Fascist Union of Youth article that you requested. --Slon02 (talk) 21:23, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --Kolchak1923 (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Tskhinval/Tskhinvali
Your edits to these articles are creating a redirect loop. There is a legitimate debate about the best name for this town, but this is not the way to do it, raise it on the talk page. PatGallacher (talk) 12:30, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

September 2012
Hello, I'm 117Avenue. Your recent edit to the page List of premiers of Quebec appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 02:08, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Zaveshchanie russkogo fashista for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zaveshchanie russkogo fashista is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zaveshchanie russkogo fashista until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Blacklake (talk) 13:11, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

us presidential libraries template
why do you believe a template that is called us president libraries should include the president of the conferedate states? Smith03 (talk) 16:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC) I am going keeping removing Davis because he was NOT a president of the USA Smith03 (talk) 13:59, 6 May 2013 (UTC) The template is for us presidential libraries that means presidential libraries of us presidents it is not for presidential libraries that are in the US Smith03 (talk) 13:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC) and the world will not collapse if davis is not on the template either and no it is not logical to include on a list of us pres libraries to include someone who was not a president of the us. Smith03 (talk) 23:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC) convenience of readers. All you did was add CSA to the title and throw davis in behind Lincoln, people who are not familiar with American history would have no way of knowing who was csa or usa. Here is a suggestion instead of trying to re propose a us pres library template create a new template title it pres libraries in us or us/cs whatever and clearly distinguish us from cs presidents. Smith03 (talk) 13:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC) What would stop you from creating a template called pres libraries in USA and including a US section a CS section and who know maybe someday a Rep of Tex space? also going thru the history of the templage page someone else beside me removed Davis and you added him backSmith03 (talk) 15:52, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Because it is the only logical and add it to the list of all the presidential libraries across the United States. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 17:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * not if the library in question was for someone who was never president of the United States. Smith03 (talk) 17:42, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * But the president was in the United States. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 18:28, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I suggest the library of the U.S. Presidents and CSA President merge into one template of presidential libraries in USA. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 18:32, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I disagree as there was only one president of the CSA beside using the term presidential libraries in the USA is too vague would you include a library for pres of the republic of texas or if someone created a "presidential library for some self declared republic would that have to be include. Smith03 (talk) 18:51, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * There are other presidential libraries in USA (except the U.S. and CSA)? --Kolchak1923 (talk) 20:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm going to leave it there, because the other presidential libraries (except the U.S. and CSA) in the United States do not. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 23:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The world will not collapse if it will now be a template for the presidential libraries in the United States. This is a logical decision, in vain you persist ... --Kolchak1923 (talk) 17:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * But where is your logic? There are a number of presidential libraries of the United States and one CSA. No other such libraries. All of them need to make up a pattern. This must be for the convenience of readers, not meet your or my ambitions. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 07:14, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The header template all have about the CSA, because readers will understand everything. Another template without your US can not create: No other presidential bibiliotek CSA (a single) or some else. Therefore it is necessary to include this template. It is not good to use administrative authority in the dispute and put protection on the template. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 15:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * This is a violation of the rules: had to turn to another administrator to establish the defense. In addition, you have not convinced me of the correctness of his views. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 21:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Bandy World Championships for women
There is no need to delete the existing redirect at Bandy World Championships for women. If you want to divide the target article, you can just hit the edit tab and directly replace the redirect with the text you want to spin off; the title does not need to be deleted for you to do so. (It is also never appropriate to place a maintenance template on top of a redirect, as that causes the page to land in the uncategorized articles queue — where it does not belong, because it isn't an article yet.)

If you wanted to move the whole current article to the new title, then deleting the redirect would be necessary so that the old article's edit history would move with it — but if you're trying to split part of the existing article out into a new spinoff with the old article still standing separately, then you can just replace the redirect with the text of a new article without anybody needing to delete it first. So kindly stop retagging the page for deletion over and over again, and just go ahead and write the article you want written. Bearcat (talk) 21:34, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2014
Your recent editing history at Atlantis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 16:40, 24 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Although the bit about edit warring is correct - you have 2 editors disagreeing with you, so you need consensus, I miscounted, you only had 2 reverts in a 24 hour period. I and the other editor have only reverted once in a 24 hour period. But you still need consensus and I doubt you are going to get it. Dougweller (talk) 21:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

October 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. From AnUnnamedUser (open talk page) 22:10, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)