User talk:Kolega2357/2012

Signature
Thanks for your message on my talk page about your signature. I have answered there. I hope my answer tells you what you need to know, but please contact me again if not. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:12, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Zdravo
Ma jok. Po talk page-u mozes da pise kako god hoces. Dokle god se razumete. :) Nightfall87 (talk) 10:25, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Pffff ne secam se dal sam pre nego sto se registrovah mogao da pravim clanke. Nisam siguran ni da sam pokusavao. Davno bese. U svakom slucaju, sad svakako mozes da ih pravis. Samo gledaj da stavis dovoljno referenci da ti ih ne bi momentalno brisali. Nightfall87 (talk) 10:39, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Ja ih nisam ni trazio. Kako bih naleteo na nesto sto mi se svidja prekopirao bih sa tudjeg profila. :) Nightfall87 (talk) 10:45, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Servisi
Recimo Najbrzi teniski servisi. Ili Najbrzi zabelezeni teniski servisi. Nightfall87 (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Administratori
Stvarno nemam pojma. Iskreno nikad mi nije ni palo na pamet da potrazim. :) Nightfall87 (talk) 22:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Zemun Gymnasium
Zbog doslednosti. Ali kad prevedem, bolje je Zemun Gymnasium. Ovo prvo bi bilo kao gimnazija Zemuna... Inace, vratio sam na Zemun Gymnasium. poz--Milan.j (talk) 08:24, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Pa da. To su uradili da se ne bi veci deo dana borili sa besmislenim clancima koje bi pravili anonimni korisnici. Ipak je engleska najprometnija...svaki dan se napravi po 1000 clanaka. Jos kad bi mogli i anonimni da ih prave... Na srpskoj je sve to lakse kontrolisati, mesecno naprave 1500 clanaka, a i treba nam malo da privucemo nove korisnike ;) --Milan.j (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Administrators
Da ne duzim mnogo, ako imas takvih ambicija, sve ti je objasnjeno na ovoj strani Guide to requests for adminship. Poz--Milan.j (talk) 15:05, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Milosczv2222
Thanks for letting me know - do you know what other en.wikipedia accounts he has used? GiantSnowman 16:57, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I have blocked the accounts that I know of on English Wikipedia, and created Sockpuppet investigations/Micky02car. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Zdravo
Na koje kutijice tacno mislis? :) U principu bi trebalo da mozes da dodajes sta hoces i kolko hoces. :) Nightfall87 (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Servisi
Na sta konkretno mislis? Kolko vidim ovi najbrzi vecinom imaju reference. Nightfall87 (talk) 09:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Aha. Ne deluje mi nesto precizno ova referenca za Raonica sto je okacena. Vest je jos iz avgusta, a u tabeli je napisano da je pre par dana odservirao 259kmph. Ako mene pitas pogledaj dal pise nesto o tome na sajtu ATP-a, eventualno sacekaj dan-dva ukoliko spomenu nesto. Ako ne slobodno menjaj. Idealno bi bilo kad bi za svaki servis iz tabele postojala pouzdana referenca. Ili bar za prvih deset. Nightfall87 (talk) 10:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Fastest tennis players
I think you left a message on my user page in error. No problem, it happens. I am not engaged in any articles about tennis players. If I have misunderstood you, please accept my apology and rephrase. Thanks. Mugginsx (talk) 19:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Rivalstvo Đokovića i Troickog
Najprikladniji termin bi bio Djokovic - Troicki rivaly. Mada iskreno sumnjam da bi taj clanak opstao. Obrisace ga u roku od par sati. Nightfall87 (talk) 20:06, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Lack of notability. Mislim da su cak i clanak o rivalstvu Djokovica i Mareja redovno brisali do pre jedno dva meseca. Nightfall87 (talk) 20:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

MFD
Hey there, I'm trying to figure out what you meant to do with that MFD. Was the MFD created in error, or the Archive? Achowat (talk) 19:23, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

CSD gone wild
Applying a db tag to Articles for deletion/DJ Forty5 had the effect of making today's AfD log and all these pages appear in CAT:CSD. Purists might say that having created Articles for deletion/DJ Forty5, you should have closed it properly with afd top and afd bottom tags. But certainly you should have done this edit before you applied the db tag to Articles for deletion/DJ Forty5. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:46, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy tagging
Hi. Thanks for patrolling new pages, but please try to use one of the standard speedy tags listed at WP:CSD. For Edward Wilding just now, you put, but the right tag would have been db-person. For a very short article db-nocontext might be appropriate, but not in this case because the subject was clear. It's important to get the right tag, because if you can't find one in the standard list it means the page should probably not be speedied, and because the right tag, when the template expands on the article page, will generate a warning for you to copy to the author's talk page: otherwise he doesn't know what he has one wrong or what has happened to his article, and probably puts it straight back in again. See WP:NPP for advice about new page patrolling - a vital activity to keep WP going. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:34, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Greengairs
Please do not restore that content. In no way does it belong here. Automatic Strikeout ( T  •  C) 20:53, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, please note that the edits you reverted here should have resulted in a warning for vandalism, not a test edit notice. Automatic Strikeout  ( T  •  C) 21:11, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Seemed to be a test?
Replied on my talk page. 86.44.206.174 (talk) 21:02, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Lazica
That article raped by Georgian nationalists who want to eliminate non-georgian South Caucasian people's (like Laz) existence. Unfortunately, Lazs are not well-known people and foreign scholars refer nationalist georgian scholars's studies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamataneri (talk • contribs) 10:37, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Zumix
What's your reasoning for undoing my improvement to the Zumix article? Acmilan10italia (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Why?
Just checking why you reverted here? (✉→BWilkins←✎) 20:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)


 * First, please keep discussions in one place: here. You are right; IP addresses cannot be confirmed ... however, we don't simply delete their request, we respond to it based on standard responses (✉→BWilkins←✎) 20:25, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Khiladi 786
I'm not sure what this revert was about. It isn't something which should be in an article so I've reverted you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:00, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Venus (yacht)

 * Read WP:CSD more accurate. Contributors sometimes create pages over several edits, so administrators should avoid deleting a page that appears incomplete too soon after its creation. NickSt (talk) 23:13, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Iowa Energy
Why did you revert my roster update???? No explanation either???? Check it out: DaHuzyBru (talk) 12:37, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol, judging by past comments on your talk page, you seem to do this reverting thing all the time to edits that don't need to be reverted and/or have a reason for being reverted. DaHuzyBru (talk) 12:49, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Power Rangers pages
I can see that you're recent changes monitoring. I removed large swathes of unsourced, unverified, and crufty content. It would be nice if it was kept that way instead of you treating it like vandalism without even adding anything to your edit summary.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 17:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Substing User Talk Templates
Hi there! When using certain templates on talk pages, such as welcome templates and user warnings, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use instead of. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. If you need any further help on the matter just ask me on my talk page. Cheers.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 17:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Miss multiverse
I declined the speedy deletion of Miss multiverse. You had it tagged as G2 and it might well deserve deletion on many grounds but it's not a test page. Best, Mackensen (talk) 05:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Improper use of tools and lack of edit summary
Please note that you may only WP:REVERT using Twinkle or other tools when the edit you're reverting is vandalism. Your recent revert did not meet that requirement. A quick review of a dozen or so of your most recent edits shows the same problem occurring. Additionally, a review of your actual edits shows that you fail to explain any of your edits in the edit summary. Using the edit summary is not optional. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)