User talk:Kolmasm

Reply
Each Wikipedia is independent and may have different standards, so its existence on cs-wiki is not relevant. It was largely sourced to itself rather than independent verifiable sources and makes no obvious claim of notability. It's basically "this is what we do", and therefore promotional.

Note that if you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:54, 25 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you - there were at least two relevant verifiable sources - the Web of science database and the Scopus database - both of which are the most relevant databases for academic journals which guarantee their relevance and validity. I frankly don't know what else you want me to source there. And yes, it is understandable that it quotes its own webpage regarding what it does, what else should it quote there? Kolmasm (talk) 12:14, 25 November 2022 (UTC)