User talk:Kolriv

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Flowerparty ■ 14:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

3RR
You are now in violation of the three-revet rule regarding the encyclopedia article; this has been reported. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 17:30, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Encyclopedia of Anthropology
Why are you so insistent on reverting a perfectly correct spelling and moving a perfectly correct placement of a stub template? --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 18:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see &mdash; you're stubbornly insisting that a spelling used by hundreds of thousands of people (at least) is archaic, and have taken it upon yourself to remove it from Wikipedia. I strongly suggest that you stop; you're already in danger of being blocked for your reverts at Encyclopedia.  --Mel Etitis  ( Μελ Ετητης ) 18:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Where are you pulling the "hundreds of thousands" figure from? Can you show any current dictionary listing the ligature version? Kolriv 19:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

3rr block on Encyclopedia
I've blocked you for WP:3RR on Encyclopedia. Please discuss this here if you wish to William M. Connolley 19:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Extended to 48 hrs for creating User:Korliv to evade the block. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 09:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Blocked for 72 hours for creating sock-puppet User:Kroliv to evade the block. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 19:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for a week for creating series of sock-puppets, including now User:Kolirv, to evade 3RR block. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 22:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Created User:Kloirv. He's clearly not interested in editing, only in this obsessive disruption.  I've blocked indefinitely, and future sock-puppets will be similarly blocked.  If he realises that he's behaving childishly, and regrets his actions, he can always say so here, or e-mail me or another admin. --Mel Etitis  ( Μελ Ετητης ) 23:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Sock-puppets

 * possibly — E Pluribus Anthony | [[User talk:E Pluribus Anthony|talk}} | 23:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this user will eventually run out of possible combinations (720, if my math is correct) and have to opt for a new username? ;) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 09:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This rather sad obsession seems to be permanent, and not limited by anagrams. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * possibly — E Pluribus Anthony | [[User talk:E Pluribus Anthony|talk}} | 23:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this user will eventually run out of possible combinations (720, if my math is correct) and have to opt for a new username? ;) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 09:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This rather sad obsession seems to be permanent, and not limited by anagrams. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * possibly — E Pluribus Anthony | [[User talk:E Pluribus Anthony|talk}} | 23:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this user will eventually run out of possible combinations (720, if my math is correct) and have to opt for a new username? ;) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 09:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This rather sad obsession seems to be permanent, and not limited by anagrams. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this user will eventually run out of possible combinations (720, if my math is correct) and have to opt for a new username? ;) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 09:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This rather sad obsession seems to be permanent, and not limited by anagrams. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this user will eventually run out of possible combinations (720, if my math is correct) and have to opt for a new username? ;) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 09:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This rather sad obsession seems to be permanent, and not limited by anagrams. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this user will eventually run out of possible combinations (720, if my math is correct) and have to opt for a new username? ;) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 09:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This rather sad obsession seems to be permanent, and not limited by anagrams. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this user will eventually run out of possible combinations (720, if my math is correct) and have to opt for a new username? ;) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 09:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This rather sad obsession seems to be permanent, and not limited by anagrams. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this user will eventually run out of possible combinations (720, if my math is correct) and have to opt for a new username? ;) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 09:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This rather sad obsession seems to be permanent, and not limited by anagrams. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this user will eventually run out of possible combinations (720, if my math is correct) and have to opt for a new username? ;) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 09:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This rather sad obsession seems to be permanent, and not limited by anagrams. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this user will eventually run out of possible combinations (720, if my math is correct) and have to opt for a new username? ;) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 09:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This rather sad obsession seems to be permanent, and not limited by anagrams. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This rather sad obsession seems to be permanent, and not limited by anagrams. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)