User talk:Kolvera/Water conflict

Hey Kristian! I enjoyed reading your article, this is some of the feedback that I would give you.

The lead does not look like it has been edited, so no commentary there.

Add headers so the reader knows which section of the article you are referencing. It’s a little hard to tell based on your sandbox, exactly where you plan to input this information into the main article.

The sources that you added all look like they are from the last 4 years which is good as they are all recent and up to date.

The information that you have written is objective for the reader and does not show any personal bias

One thing that I think that you could do to improve the article more is to focus specifically on one section. It is a good introduction to what transboundary water is, but its a little hard to see which section of the article you plan on improving with your edits, so I would say go more in-depth about transboundary water systems and the UN and the impacts and implications it has on the modern world.

It does not look as if the edits that have been made are addressing any of the equity gaps within Wikipedia

For each sentence or statement that you make you have a source to back it up which is very good. It is well written and appears to be grammatically correct. The picture that you added goes along well with the information that you have presented, and the caption that you have adequately reflects it.

Good Job! Fikiki123 (talk) 03:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC) fikiki123