User talk:Kong of Lasers

Speedy deletion nomination of Li Yanrong


A tag has been placed on Li Yanrong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Yashovardhan (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Li Yanrong declined
Hello. Per the notice you received above, a tag had been placed on Li Yanrong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. Please note that after review, I have declined the deletion request so you do not need to worry about this article being speedily deleted. Please note that speedy deletion is only one of three deletion processes on Wikipedia; my decline does not prevent users from invoking the separate, longer term deletion methods of proposed deletion or bringing the article to articles for deletion. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mz7 (talk) 17:17, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Kong of Lasers, you are invited to the Teahouse!
I addressed this in my request. Like I said, the houses in my neighborhood are very close together, so my IP address may show up as the same as any of my neighbors. I have no intentions to vandalize Wikipedia at all.Kong of Lasers (talk) 22:47, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * That is, quite simply, not how IP addresses work. Revent talk 14:41, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, but can't you limit my edits to files only?Kong of Lasers (talk) 22:33, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I certainly can't, since I have no advanced permissions over here. The community could impose a topic ban (which is not a technical measure) but I think it's pretty unlikely you're going to be unblocked just for that, given your requests so far. You might want to go read Guide to appealing blocks, as was suggested above. Revent talk 22:41, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Still blocked?
Dear Wikipedia, Why on Earth can you not limit me only to the File namespace? --Kong of Lasers (talk) 04:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Okay, I will upload a family photo. Thank you for observing that the houses stacked together thing wasn't meant to work because I know what IP addresses were. Thanks to AT&T, my Internet service provider, my IP address is basically in their control. So according to Wikimedia, it is impossible for more than one family members to have an account because we have the same IP address? That's BS. --Kong of Lasers (talk) 04:18, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * We have no way of telling whether the photo you intend to upload shows your family. Even if we accept it's yours, we still would not be able to tell which person in that family used what account. What we do know is that this account was created a few days after "your brother's" was indefinitely blocked, plus strong, strong behavioural evidence. The fact that "your brother" admitted to lying earlier about creating sockpuppets to evade the block of course also makes it more difficult to believe in coincidence. Huon (talk) 15:27, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I have read The duck test and I have declared on Wikimedia Commons that I have nothing to do with him. If he confessed to creating sockpuppets, that's his problem. But can you show me the page in which he confessed. By the way I will put

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 20:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I've reverted your talk page access. If we take you at your word that this is a coincidence because "the houses in my neighborhood are kind of stacked together" "he's my brother" and "it is not possible for me to edit on a different IP address as him or my friends(or his friends）" then you're both equally incompentent to edit Wikipedia at this time and should not be unblocked. But you're not separate individuals and, besides the obvious behavioural evidence in addition to the technical confirmation, you have one very very unusual tell that gives you away. I've revoked talk page access to prevent any further time wasting here. If you want to pursue an unblock you'll have to use WP:UTRS via your original account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:59, 13 September 2017 (UTC)