User talk:Konigstephan

Welcome!
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

August 2016
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MjolnirPants  Tell me all about it.  17:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

BLP violation
Adding unsourced contentious material to something about a living person is a violation of our WP:BLP policy. Please don't do it again. Doug Weller talk 17:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

July 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Magicians of the Gods, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 10:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 10:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Important message
— Paleo Neonate  – 11:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Important reminder and notice
~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Fringe focused editor pushing COVID-19-related original research. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Glen (talk) 11:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security for one week for edit warring. If you continue without getting a consensus after this block expires, or your editing in relation to Covid-19 is disruptive in any way, you should expect to be santioned under the Covid-19 restrictions as notified further up this talk page. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I also note that since you have been registered here, you have never edited any talk page and have never responded to any concerns here on your own talk page. Per Communication is required, that is not acceptable. If you continue to fail to respond when approach about issues related to your editing, that is also likely to lead to further sanctions. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)