User talk:Kontrola

Proposed deletion of Directorate of Economic Intelligence


The article Directorate of Economic Intelligence has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Security companies of Poland


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Security companies of Poland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Smjg (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Abakanowicz Art Room


The article The Abakanowicz Art Room has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 23:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Directorate of Economic Intelligence for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Directorate of Economic Intelligence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Directorate of Economic Intelligence until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 23:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of René Patrick Burakowski


The article René Patrick Burakowski has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 00:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marek Ronowski


The article Marek Ronowski has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 00:03, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jidi Majia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hassanal Abdullah, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bengali and Shamsur Rahman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Hassanal Abdullah
I recommend the use of the wp:template template:cite book It will generate a link (via ISBN) to enable searching for the book via a number of resources. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Marek Ronowski for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marek Ronowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marek Ronowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of René Patrick Burakowski for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article René Patrick Burakowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/René Patrick Burakowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Zhao Si Fang for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zhao Si Fang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zhao Si Fang until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of The Abakanowicz Art Room for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Abakanowicz Art Room is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Abakanowicz Art Room until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:45, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Articles for deletion/Marek Ronowski in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Nicnote •  ask me a question  •  contributions  09:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Czym jest Wikipedia
Po pierwsze, chcialem podziekowac za wklad wlozony w popularyzowanie kultury polskiej. To jest wazne - ale musimy jednak pamietac, ze celem Wikipedii nie jest popularyzowanie czy promowanie czegokolwiek. Jej celem jest informowanie o tematach encyklopedycznych. Nie wszystko, co szlachetne, jest encyklopedyczne (WP:NOBLE). Warto przeczytac pl:Wikipedia:Czym Wikipedia nie jest i pl:Wikipedia:Encyklopedyczność. Nie kazdy jest encyklopedyczny. Ja tez napisalem kilka art., ktore spolecznosc uznala za nie-encyklopedyczne (pl:Wikipedysta:Piotrus/Tôn Vân Anh, User:Piotrus/Uncle Yo. Niestety, sa granice, niekiedy nie jasne, i jest stresujace, gdy nasz wklad jest uznany za nie pasujacy do projektu. Warto w takim razie poprosic, by artykul zamiast byc skasowany byl przeniesiony do brudnopisu; moze za kilka lat o danej osobie bedzie wiecej zrodel i nie trzeba bedzie pisac od nowa. Po drugie, jesli czyims celem jest promocja jakiegos (szlachetnego...) tematu, to Wikipedia nie moze byc pierwszym krokiem. Od tego sa portale takie jak culture.pl i wiele innych. Jak tam opublikuje sie art. o artyscie czy dziele, to potem jest dobre zrodlo do Wikipedii. Ale jak o kims czy o czyms sie nie pisze, to jest trudno argumentowac, ze temat jest encyklopedyczny... (A to, ze w Wikipedii znajduja sie art. ktorych tu nie pwinno byc, bo jeszcze sie nikt do nich nie przyczepil, to tylko zaproszenie do pomocy w znajdowaniu i kasowaniu takich wpisow). Mam nadzieje, ze przyszle wpisy Kolegi Edytora beda mialy wiecej szczescia - bo bedzie Kolega Edytor pamietal o zasadach encyklopedycznosci. Pozdrawiam, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:46, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ingmar De Vos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FEI ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ingmar_De_Vos check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ingmar_De_Vos?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Undid revision 1065873584 by Kontrola (talk) The deletion of this paragraph should be consider vandalism.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.167.207.7 (talk) 20:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Maria Wąsowska moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Maria Wąsowska, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx Talk ? 15:47, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Maria Wąsowska
Hello, Kontrola. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maria Wąsowska, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Maria Wąsowska


Hello, Kontrola. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maria Wąsowska".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)