User talk:Konway87

Speedy deletion of Studio Mook
A tag has been placed on Studio Mook requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Whispe ring  17:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Your contributions: please cite verifiable sources.
Your recent contribution(s) to are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Your references for The Underdwellers (Batman: The Animated Series) and P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series) are too vague to verify. If notability cannot be established by verifiable citations to reliable sources, they may be subject to deletion. Please provide specific references for all information you add to Wikipedia. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tv.com/batman-the-animated-series/p.o.v./episode/68574/summary.html. As a copyright violation, P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 20:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Smurfs Season 8.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Smurfs Season 8.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:35, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Smurfs Season 7.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Smurfs Season 7.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Additional Story Editing for Season 7.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Additional Story Editing for Season 7.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Your articles
Articles like Story Editor Credits for The Smurfs Season 8 are probably way too small and specific a subject for an article. Why not an a sentence or two to an existing article instead? Friday (talk) 17:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series)
I have nominated P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 18:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 18:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MuZemike ( talk ) 19:54, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Story Editor Credits for The Smurfs Season 7
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Story Editor Credits for The Smurfs Season 7, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

Proposed deletion of Story Editor Credits for The Smurfs Season 8
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Story Editor Credits for The Smurfs Season 8, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

Use of Smurfs screen caps
Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies on non-free content and Wikipedia's reliable sources guideline. Fair use of screen caps is only allowed on articles about the films or TV shows they came from, not on articles about actors and filmmakers. Image:Smurfs Season 7.jpg and Image:Smurfs Season 8.jpg have been removed from the Glenn Leopold and Sean Catherine Derek pages as non-fair uses. Your use of a screen caps as a citations is inappropriate. Reliable text sources are available for screen credits. • Gene93k (talk) 12:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Also, please familiarize yourself with the policy "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please consider them and before creating a new page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 12:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Story Editor Credits for The Smurfs Season 8
A tag has been placed on Story Editor Credits for The Smurfs Season 8 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 06:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Frances Novier
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Frances Novier, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Non-notable writer

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cunard (talk) 04:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Konway87! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Dick Sebast -

Book of Revelation
We don't add material by self-published authors, see WP:RS. And even if that weren't the case, we would rarely add so much material by one author unless they were a renowned expert, and we wouldn't use words such as 'interesting. Dougweller (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

You need to format Summer of '42 (book)
Greetings, your article Summer of '42 (book) has some formatting issues you need to look into. I fixed the lack of categories (which caused your article to drop to WP:UNCAT), but you need to fix the footnotes.

On Wiki, you don't just type [1] where you want a note, and [1] matching it in References. Instead there's a simple way to code footnotes so they're automatically numbered and ordered. That way your numbers don't get messed up as the structure changes over time. The details are at WP:Footnotes, but I've fixed the first footnote for you as an example. Feel free to write me if you have any questions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:20, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Crawford Codex
Hi, I'm Smd49. Konway87, thanks for creating Crawford Codex!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for taking the time to add a new article to Wikipedia! I have tidied up some of your references but could not do them all. There is a tutorial on adding footnotes at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing_sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 22:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, I noticed this when commenting below, and have tidied up the article. There are 2 major Crawford manuscripts at John Rylands, the Crawford Codex is the other one, in Latin about astrology, so I've moved it to Crawford Aramaic New Testament manuscript, a descriptive title. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Aramaic
Hi, welcome to wikipedia, and thanks for your contributions, but the religion articles are one area (there are plenty of others) where non-mainstream fringe content can be presented but must be done so with rigorous sourcing. The edits you made appear to have been reverted by other editors, in each case reasonable it appears. This is a request to read up on policies such as WP:PSTS and WP:IRS before making further edits, or someone will just revert them anyway. Best regards. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm Coasterlover1994. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Language of Jesus, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 00:39, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Language of the New Testament with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 00:51, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Language of the New Testament. Amaury (talk) 01:00, 29 June 2013 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 01:05, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
I have removed your reposting of the same WP:SYNTHESIS material on Language of the New Testament, and per warnings by User:Coasterlover1994, User:Amaury, User:Materialscientist you are advised to desist. Personally I'm of the view that it is the time for a TOPIC BAN, but as a SPA that would basically mean a site ban. If you can edit constructively using Talk pages to discuss and modern (post 1980) secondary sources then there's a place here, otherwise not. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Laren Bright for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laren Bright is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Laren Bright until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 15:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)