User talk:Kool appe

June 2013
Your recent editing history at Nine Muses (band) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  22:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Nine Muses (band). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  22:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Nine Muses (band). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  22:46, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nine Muses (band), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  22:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  22:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  23:05, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
You're edit warring on Requests for page protection of all places, repeatedly reinserting personal attacks. You have been warned against various forms of disruption several times above. This time you're blocked. Bishonen &#124; talk 23:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC).
 * P.S. I just noticed the way you deleted Dr K's request the second time; nice touch. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; talk 23:13, 7 June 2013 (UTC).

DrK, Drmies
Feel free to ban my accounts (to help you: Vgleer, Kool Ape, and this one), for I am done with wikipedia. Clearly, wikipedia is not-objective and not unbiased, for it is ruled by a gang of pompous insiders (made up failed and wanna-be academics, I presume). It is very obvious, that "DrK" and his little buddy "Drmies" have a bias against the South Korean band Nine Muses. Why else would they act in concert to remove completely harmless content, such as the real names of Nine Muses, which happen to be written in Hangul -- not surprising given that they are Korean? Why remove their birth dates, even when a perfect reference in the form of a video made by a South Korean TV station is provided? Why make baseless accusations, such as that the majority of that page is written by Nine Muses' agency (they don't even have a decent English speaker)? In short, now I know how wikipedia works, i.e. it is ruled by a cabal of well connected insiders with almost unlimited and unchecked power to bully and edit at will.

DrK, Drmies
Feel free to ban my accounts (to help you: Vgleer, Kool Ape, and this one), for I am done with wikipedia. Clearly, wikipedia is not-objective and not unbiased, for it is ruled by a gang of pompous insiders (made up failed and wanna-be academics, I presume). It is very obvious, that "DrK" and his little buddy "Drmies" have a bias against the South Korean band Nine Muses. Why else would they act in concert to remove completely harmless content, such as the real names of Nine Muses, which happen to be written in Hangul -- not surprising given that they are Korean? Why remove their birth dates, even when a perfect reference in the form of a video made by a South Korean TV station is provided? Why make baseless accusations, such as that the majority of that page is written by Nine Muses' agency (they don't even have a decent English speaker)? In short, now I know how wikipedia works, i.e. it is ruled by a cabal of well connected insiders with almost unlimited and unchecked power to bully and edit at will. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Appe kool (talk • contribs) 03:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Not "ban", "block"--now indefinitely for self-confessed socking. Drmies (talk) 04:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)