User talk:Koolx

Image tagging for File:John taylor.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:John taylor.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

- TaggingBot, I have already provided a source and purpose of the picture in the link you provided. I got the pic from google. Hey, why did you delete what I typed up in the article when you deleted the pic? I can understand why you deleted the pic. But you didnt have to also delete the info I typed up for that pic. That was not necessary. Why did you do that? Koolx (talk)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Devil May Cry: The Animated Series, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:14, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Edit-warring on Goths article
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:52, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

September 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Goths. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Favonian (talk) 15:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

You are evidently the same person who has so persistently tried to use changing IP addresses to reinstate a highly POV version of the Goths article. Your edits furthermore show a striking resemblance to those of. Finally, your attempts (anonymously or otherwise) to impose your alternative and rather subjective version of the Jerónimo de Ayanz y Beaumont article, either directly or through the Jeronimo Beaumont redirect, are equally disruptive. If you resume this kind of behavior after your current block expires, the next one will very likely be indefinite. Favonian (talk) 15:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment on your block

October 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing your edit warring over the Goths article using the obvious sock puppet. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 21:00, 30 October 2013 (UTC)