User talk:Koopa24

Recent edit to Koopa Troopa
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you!  Bfpage &#124;leave a message 17:32, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Solar calendar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Solar calendar was changed by Koopa24 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872436 on 2015-03-12T18:41:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Solar panel
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits as you did to Solar panel. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Thank you!  Bfpage &#124;leave a message 18:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rev. H. Carlton Earwiggherd


A tag has been placed on User:Rev. H. Carlton Earwiggherd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 16:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Rev. H. Carlton Earwiggherd
Hello Koopa24, I saw you already found my talk page; I have replied there regarding the mentorship on images. On an entirely unrelated note, I saw you created User:Rev. H. Carlton Earwiggherd and posted what looks like a printer log. That's another editor's user page, and I expect they'll be rather surprised to find your log on their page. To me that looked like a test edit; if you don't mind I'll delete the page.

On yet another unrelated note, you asked on your own user page whether you can talk to ClueBot NG. That's a fully automatic anti-vandalism bot, and while technically you could leave the bot, as opposed to its operator, a message, that would be rather pointless since the bot is not programmed to even acknowledge that someone has messaged it, much less reply. If an edit of yours was reverted by ClueBot, you should (if on second thought you still think the edit improves the article; after all, ClueBot is a very well-honed machine that, while not perfect, is good at reverting only unhelpful edits) simply revert the bot. It may help to add an explanation of why you think that edit is beneficial either in the edit summary or on the talk page; otherwise a human editor may revert you in a knee-jerk reaction without looking at the substance of your edit. ClueBot itself, however, does not edit-war; I don't think it would revert you twice in a row. In this particular case on the solar calendar article, my advice would be not to re-add that sentence; it doesn't really tell our readers much about solar calendars, and technically it's not even true since you could easily design a solar calendar for Mars - I hear that's indeed a task commonly set for astronomy students. Huon (talk) 18:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Koopaphobia


A tag has been placed on Koopaphobia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:54, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Criticism
I'm sorry you felt criticized by my comments either here or on my talk page; that was not my intention. However, edits such as this or this appear to be irrelevant or even nonsensical and were quickly reverted. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and edit accordingly. If you add content, back it up with reliable sources so our readers can verify it. If you want to write a new article, WP:Your first article and the notability guidelines may be of interest. I'll gladly help with any further questions you have; if you'd prefer someone else to mentor you, that could also be arranged. 21:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm NawlinWiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to User:Fatemi because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year


Happy New Year! , Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year 2015, and I hope you have your enjoyment for your parents, siblings and other relatives and Happy New Year. --Koopa24--

Gatorade. Grand. Drink.




March 2015
Hello, I'm Codename Lisa. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Screenshot, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 06:56, 24 March 2015 (UTC)==Thank you SO much==

Blocked
I have blocked you from editing because your contributions crossed the line from the merely useless to the outright disruptive. You clearly are not here to improve the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Huon (talk) 23:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Unblock Me!

 * By requesting unblocks for other accounts? By granting yourself barnstars in others' name, faking their signature? By attacking already-blocked users? Huon (talk) 19:40, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Demand an unblock
You know what? I have been doing that. I will not do that again if you unblock me. Koopa24 (talk) 20:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Solareclipse listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Solareclipse. Since you had some involvement with the Solareclipse redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jerodlycett (talk) 09:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)