User talk:Koopnasty/sandbox

Seville Economy
edits relevant? They are relevant but vague. More detailed information could be hard to find.

edits Neutral? It is the capital of Adalusia, neutral views.

citations to claims, reliable?

Sources for improvement: How municipalities depend on economy. What types of agriculture and industrial exports. Trends in growth or decline. A third section to possible include statistics? A tourism section under the economy header. Innovative fields are listed, Possibly add to it or go into detail on each subject.

Economy
Seville’s economy can be classified as a modern ‘smart economy’, a highly functional, profitable, and adaptable system.

Tourism
Seville has resourced its vast cultural monuments and activities of the urban heritage into a tourist product, promoting economic development and growth. Like other Spanish cities, Seville faces local controversy over conservatives who see tourism as exploiting culture against those who unsustainably treat tourism for pure economic benefit. However, promotion of tourism benefits the economy because of increased external spending.

Peer Edit
Spelling/ Grammar: - Seville Economy - Meets standards; there was one specific mis-spelling in the first paragraph and some capitalization issues in the chart. - Tourism - Exceeds standards

Language: - Seville Economy - Exceeds standards; extremely professional language, but not to much that it goes over my head. Got the information across clearly. - Tourism - Exceeds standards; the language is good and strong, but for the topic of "tourism" maybe dial it back a tad to       fit the persona of tourism (if that makes any sense).

Organization: - Seville Economy - Meets standard; the information in the paragraphs are organized great, but the chart doesn't seem to        have relevance in the section though. If it does, give some background on why the info in the chart relate to this part. - Tourism - Exceeds standards

Coding: - Seville Economy - Exceeds standards - Tourism - Exceeds standards - Bullfighting - Exceeds standards

Validity: - Seville Economy - Exceeds standards; the validity of sources show and prove the validity of the information that you provided. - Tourism

Completion: - Seville Economy - Meets standards; the only critique would be the chart because kind of interrupts the way the paragraph reads. - Tourism - Meets standards; it seems complete but to be more complete I think the part about tourism effect on       economy needs to be replaced with something more about tourism.

Relevance: - Seville Economy - Exceeds standards; the title of the section and the information within are very relevant to one another. - Tourism - Exceeds standards, the relevance between the section title and information between is clear and concise other than the economy effects.

Sources: - Nearly meets standards; great sources from creditable websites/ databases, you just need one more citation (maybe use it to help you write about the chart.

Citations: - Meets standards; the only thing I see that could be changed is in some sentence are that the citation is done before the period and some are done after, you may want to put them all after the period just for format purposes.

References: - Exceed standards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forrestbevington (talk • contribs) 04:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

--Forrestbevington (talk) 15:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)