User talk:KoosJaspers

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Francis Schonken 11:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Salome
True, I had been a bit rash in reverting your contributions to the Salome article: --Francis Schonken 11:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * however, the "satanic" epithet (etc) used in that contribution didn't seem to have much of an encyclopedical value.
 * yes, indeed, use references to reliable sources for whatever you contribute: the more far-fetched the claims are (and I think "gnostic traditions" beyond the usual environment of an average reader of the encyclopedia), the more such references are wanted. If good sources are provided, you can write almost anything (insofar what you write is covered by such sources, of course). I haven't been involved in the "Dance of the seven veils" article myself, but I recon it could profit from some cleanup (and listing of sound references).

Salome, sequel
I reverted your edit for the reasons given in my Edit summary :
 * Don't remove "Commons" link please : You had removed for no discernable reason. That links to commons:Category:Salome showing more than a dozen Salome paintings.
 * Wikipedia tries to avoid "curiosa"/"trivia" - see talk page : The talk page being Talk:Salome, discussing trivia extensively. Insofar as "curiosa" is yet another cover-up name for "trivia" and the like, I applied Trivia

Why I did *not* revert is because of the unsourced statements. But still, I saw no intention from your side to follow Citing sources (despite my previous message on this talk page of yours). If you don't mention any source for the statements you want to see included in Wikipedia (and which are still interpretations that are beyond common knowledge), they can be removed on sight per Verifiability. Again, that's not why I removed these statements this time, but you've been invited twice now to provide references to reliable sources: if you still think sources are not needed, I can only say that mentioning "hermetic rites that were in decay at Herod's time", and the like, will not get by without a serious reference to a scholar work. --Francis Schonken 12:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:JamesErb3.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:JamesErb3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 15:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:LeonaertBramer Salome.jpg


The file File:LeonaertBramer Salome.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)