User talk:Kopf1988/Archive 1

Regarding Communications
I'm going to put this as nicely as possible. You're not very bright. You ask people questions in forums and on wiki. If you want to have a serious conversation with me, you'll have to use aim. My aol screenname is cverlo. If you want a serious conversation, try that. If not, your loss. Cverlo 17:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm willing to have a serious conversation. But not publically.  You ask me, or anyone, a question publically, and you get the public answer.  That's life.  Cverlo 18:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

New Video Game Article
Hey! I saw that you created a new video game related article- consider joining the Computer and Video Games WikiProject! I have added your article to the list of new articles, and attributed it to you. --PresN 17:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

RPG
please note i also reverted my self Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

LAN Gaming Center
I appreciate your recent comment and work on LAN Gaming Center. It would be helpful if you would comment on my recent dmoz suggestion and change, whether you weigh in positively, negatively or inbetween. I think it is important to demonstrate to the silent reverters that there can respectful dialog even if we don't agree and we might even come to a consensus! The main anon IP has been blocked and I have asked for a semi-protect on the page to calm things down (which means the anons can't edit, if it becomes protected). JonHarder 05:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Rpgmakerone.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rpgmakerone.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 21:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Sailor Moon S movie

 * Himeko is not a cat. The sentence was phrase badly, and I've fixed it. Danny Lilithborne 03:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

cartoon song
Thanks for helping out with the cartoon song. So many negative editors out there tsk tsk. --Whatfg 18:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem! Thank you. Kopf1988 18:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Deletion explaination
There is nothing to correct -- ironically, the name of the convention should give you a preview why: not every anime convention is inherently notable... especially one with just over 500 visitors. I know you like anime, but please take a look at WP:ILIKEIT. Not a valid reason to keep it here. Delete and salt if persists, until notability has been established by reliable sources. /Blaxthos 22:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Excusing the Article X is noteworthy, so this should be too argument, is there any other reason why this convention is actually notable? I believe if it were, there would be reliable sources for use in applying WP:ATT.  /Blaxthos 22:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


 * None of those sources are reliable. Please check out WP:RS -- self published sources are not appropriate for wikipedia.  I also suggest re-reading WP:N.  /Blaxthos 23:19, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents of Another Anime Convention
See User talk:Kopf1988/Another Anime Convention.

Another Anime Convention AfD
I looked over it again per your request. However, I still believe the page should be deleted. I have added my reasoning to the AfD. If you wish to contest this further, you can list the page at WP:DRV. Thanks, Prodego  talk  23:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mindbridge Foundation
An editor has nominated Mindbridge Foundation, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 16:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

avcon
thanks for cleaning up my edits. so do you go to avcon every year? btw i post on gamefaqs to, with nickname mastertazo. i'm sure i've seen you somewhere as i enjoy rpgs as well.

Here's how this works - re:AfD discussions
Here's how this works, David. You disagree with me, fine, I get that. However, just because something is nominated for an AfD, does *not* necessarily mean that it *will* be deleted. It's up to you to present your case with facts, as I have done for my point of view, in the AfD discussion. Making bad-faith allegations against other editors is not the way to go, especially when, as in this case, I have presented a thorough search to back up my argument. I see you tried to link this to my problems with WCityMike from last year - the difference in that case and this situation is that he was shown to have not done *any* research on the subject, was vindictive in targeting ALL fanfilms, and there were allegations of sockpuppetry against him which, while never proven, damaged his case and credibility, which eventually led to him leaving Wikipedia.

I've backed up my argument with facts. Will you do the same for yours? Or is this just going to come down to baseless accusations? Your call. MikeWazowski 04:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually, I mistook that argument in a different way, and consequently put my post in the wrong place (as you can tell by edit hist) I just decided to leave it nearby for ease of reference. Had you considered a prod for AnimeIowa? For something running nearly 10 years, seems like more sources could easily be found if you seemed to have so much reasoning behind your AfD tag. Finally, google test is not a good indicator of notability. Its highly suspicious that after I disagree with you in one AfD, you find the convention I claimed was my favorite and you decide to mark it (and related material) for deletion. Case closed. Kopf1988

Image:Buu-chan Fans01.gif
Hello, Kopf1988. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Buu-chan Fans01.gif) was found at the following location: User:Kopf1988/AnimeIowa. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Conference Notice
I have remove the notice you added, You may wish to read this --Fredrick day 20:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Anime South
I would appreciate any comments you may have on the Anime South Deletion review page. -Animesouth 20:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your efforts. There are 15 references that you can use.  We had 463 attendees our first year and 1,024 attendees last year (our 2nd year), a number which is also referenced by one of the included references (newspaper).  There are 5 newspaper articles there in total (1 is a pictorial commentary).

http://www.animesouth.com/docs/wiki.doc http://www.animesouth.com
 * Hey, did you need any other info from me for this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Animesouth (talk • contribs) 18:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

AntiWikipedia @ Wikidot
Hi kopf1988, it's Angelika again from AntiWikipedia. Sorry to bother you once again, but what happened is that when you gave me the login information for the wikidot account for the antiwikipedia site you gave me a username instead of the email it asks for when login in. You can send it again to me through the private messaging system in Wikidot or mail it to me to AngelikaStokesATgmailDotCOM. Thanks for your help, God Bless. AngelikaStokes (talk) 12:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rpgmakerone.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rpgmakerone.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rpgmakerone.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Rpgmakerone.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Associated Content
While the article looks like it is well written, the line in NOR that I would question in this case is "If an editor has published the results of his or her research in a reliable publication...". There is an ongoing discussion of this site on the Admin Noticeboard. I would welcome you to put some of the sources you used to write the article. Stealthound (talk) 03:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of First Person Plural: My Life As A Multiple
I have nominated First Person Plural: My Life As A Multiple, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Person Plural: My Life As A Multiple. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? &mdash; G716  &lt;T·C&gt; 22:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Innovis Article
Ok, I updated the article and added verifiable information references. I also made it less messy and less of a "shill", and tried to make the article purely informational. Radical Mallard 7:17 PM EST, 09/25/2008

Your request for rollback
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Tiptoety talk 17:41, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback may be removed at any time.

File source problem with File:Animeiowa-panel.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Animeiowa-panel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 10:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Please update your status with WP:VG
Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or User WPVG somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
 * Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
 * Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
 * —WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot  03:34, 24 September 2009 (UTC)