User talk:Koppite1

Copyright violation at Model minority
Your edit to Model minority has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 01:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Apologies. I am sometimes prone to forget copyrights when editing. I'll try harder in future. I enjoy editing and don't want to be banned  for copyright violation.
 * I want to reinsert the paragraph. I have changed it to the following.  Tried to put things into my own words. Is this OK?
 * According to the the Migration Policy Institute, approximately 4.4 million Caribbean immigrants lived in the United States in 2017. The largest immigrant Caribbean groups are from Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Haiti, and Trinidad and Tobago. Overall, there are 8 million people who were either born in the Caribbean or who have Caribbean ancestry.
 * According to a report in the International Business Times, Caribbean immigrants fair better than the general immigrant population in terms of high school graduation and some soci-economic indicators. According to the Migration Policy Institute, Caribbeans are far more likely to become naturalised American citizens than other immigrant groups. Caribbeans tend to be more proficient in English and are likely to be employed at the same rate as the general immigrant population. Caribbean immigrants are much more likely to have health care insurance than other immigrant populations. According to a report drawn from Immigration Studies (CIS), various Latin American and Caribbean communities are among the top immigrant home owners in America. These success stories are primarily why Caribbean-Americans have been described as a model minority. Koppite1 (talk) 06:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Koppite1. It's certainly better but there are a few parts that still look pretty close to the original source wording. It seems like you might still be starting with the source sentences in some cases and reordering or replacing words with their synonyms, but this results in close paraphrasing (in which the source material is only superficially modified). I sometimes find it helpful to read the source, then try to summarize it without directly referring to it (of course you can look at it afterwards, but this might help avoid the temptation of using the same or substantially similar phrasing). Hope that makes sense. DanCherek (talk) 11:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I think i've changed it as much as i can now. Hope this is good enough to reinsert in the article.
 * In 2017, there were approximately 4.4milliion Caribbean immigrants in the US. Overall, there are 8million people of Caribbean heritage. Cubans, Dominicans, Jamaicans, Haitians, and Trinidad and Tobagans are the largest groups. Caribbeans are likely to be employed at the same rate as the general immigrant population and at a higher rate than native born Americans
 * According to a report in the International Business Times, Caribbean immigrants perform better than the general immigrant population in terms of high school graduation rates and some soci-economic indicators. In comparison to other immigrant groups, Caribbeans are far more likely to be naturalised American citizens, display a better standard of English and have a greater tendency for have health insurance cover. According to a report drawn from Immigration Studies (CIS), various Caribbean communities are among the top immigrant home owners in America.
 * These success stories are primarily why some Caribbean-Americans have been described as a model minority. Koppite1 (talk) 12:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I would give it a quick grammar check, but that is better in terms of copyright. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Your recent editing history at Max Verstappen shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tvx1 15:19, 5 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Take your own advice and seek consensus before unilaterally removing long standing, important text Koppite1 (talk) 15:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Just because false information was overlooked for a considerable time, it doesn’t make it non-removable. It was still false.Tvx1 16:06, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It's not false information. The safety car was brought in a lap early, contrary to the standard procedure. Next time seek consensus before taking it upon yourself to remove pertinent  text Koppite1 (talk) 16:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It is false, because the quoted regulation is not the only applicable one. There is no consenus among reliable sources that safety car was called in “too early”. Besides, an can equally claim it was called in “too late”.Tvx1 16:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Maybe you are new to F1, but standard procedure dictates the safety car comes in the following lap and it's upon that understanding that teams plan strategy. The safety car going in a lap earlier than standard protocol was crucial in giving Verstappen the chance he got. Now rather than rehashing the same old points, let's  wait for some talk page consensus. If the majority agree with you and don't want it included, then so be it--but at least get some consensus/opinions on it Koppite1 (talk) 16:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Beyoncé genres
There's a discussion regarding your edits on Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentsDollysOnMyMind (talk) 09:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


 * You should have taken it to the relevant talk page first. That is the orderly way to do it. Why have you  bypassed the Beyonce talk page?? Koppite1 (talk) 09:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You refused to discuss it to this talk page, deleted the discussion several times, and continued the edit war DollysOnMyMind (talk) 09:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I have already explained my position umpteen times. You should be opening up a discussion on the talk page and seeking consensus. Koppite1 (talk) 09:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Unsourced edit
I'm Koppite1. This message concerns this particular edit and several similar edits as well. You replaced three certification values without providing any sources for these changes. This is highly problematic. An editor or reader might check the value against the existing source and find it incorrect. In most cases, they would likely delete the certification entirely. Please ensure you do not update data without citing a reliable source. If you're unsure how to do this, feel free to ask, and I'd be happy to assist if I'm available. Best regards and happy editing! --Muhandes (talk) 07:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi. At the time of the edits, the existing sources already contained the updated information, so i simply reused the source. Thanks Koppite1 (talk) 08:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid you are wrong. For reference, this is the page as you left it. You claim it contains the updated information. To check it, follow source number [29] which you claim will source 11× Platinum for "Crazy in Love" and check if it verifies the source. The same goes for source [37] which you claimed will verify 7× Platinum on "Irreplaceable" and 13× Platinum on "Halo" - it doesn't. In general, this is true for all ARIA certifications - the existing sources will only contain the updated information if the updated certification was from the same year. In this case, you claimed 2023 and 2022 certification sources will validate a 2024 certification. If you look at the current version of the page, after I fixed the sources, you will see all these certifications now point to the correct source - the 2024 certification (source [29]). It was not difficult to do with the cite certification template and source reuse. I hope this is helpful. Again, if you need additional help, ping me or leave a message at my talk page, and I'll be happy to help if I am available. I usually don't watch talk pages anymore. Muhandes (talk) 14:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * No worries. Pretty sure i had did things correctly at the initial edit but apologies if that wasn't the case. Not sure what happened, why i didn't change the sources. I'll double check in future. And thanks for the offer of help.  Much appreciated. Koppite1 (talk) 15:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)