User talk:KoreanAsian12

September 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bourton, North Somerset—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bourton, North Somerset. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bourton, North Somerset, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

It isn't disruptive editing. It isn't vandalizing Wikipedia. What is wrong with my edit to Bourton, North Somerset? KoreanAsian12 (talk) 15:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi KoreanAsian12, welcome to Wikipedia! The reason your edit to the page for Bourton, North Somerset was deleted is that page is what's called a "Redirect page" - it's not an article page, and shouldn't have any information included in it.  It re-directs someone searching for Bourton, North Somerset to the article on Wick St. Lawrence. Information on Bourton could be added to the Wick St. Lawrence page. For more information on re-direct pages, please see Redirect.  Happy editing! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 14:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Everard Digby have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Everard Digby was changed by KoreanAsian12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917664 on 2021-09-11T18:35:47+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yves Navarre. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Yves Navarre, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

J.H. Williams III
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to J.H. Williams III, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 14:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Adding unsourced information
Please refrain from adding unsourced information to articles, such as places of birth/death. If you do not have a reliable source to support your edits they will be reverted. Continued editing of this nature can be considered disruptive editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gerald Legge, 9th Earl of Dartmouth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dartmouth. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Blake (governor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charleston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Please refrain from adding unsourced information to articles, such as places of birth/death. If you do not have a reliable source to support your edits they will be reverted. Continued editing of this nature can be considered disruptive editing. Chewings72 (talk) 12:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Israel Palestine
Selfstudier (talk) 15:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Leonor Cortés Moctezuma. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''You provide no citation for location of her birth, and other evidence suggests your stated location is false. I note you were warned about this last month, as well.'' Tarl N. ( discuss ) 16:53, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Again, I reverted your changes. You have no citation for her death. Where she died is not known. You may not just guess at where she died, in Wikipedia, all biographies may state only what is [known. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 20:33, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Of course, you are correct. Although, she would have died in the Spanish Empire. KoreanAsian12 (talk) 20:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * And then you went right ahead and added it again, not for the first time. You have been indefblocked for disruptive editing; you are not welcome here. Graham 87 03:34, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

I do have sources though KoreanAsian12 (talk) 12:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Official block notice
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graham 87 03:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

I have sources for the place of birth and the place of death. https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/GW8J-FKP/leonor-cort%C3%A9s-de-moctezuma-1528-1562 for the place of death. https://gw.geneanet.org/chantallmc?lang=en&pz=daniel+xavier&nz=baz&p=leonor&n=cortes+moctezuma for the place of birth. KoreanAsian12 (talk) 12:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Those wouldn't meet the requirements of Reliable sources because they are user-generated websites. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

So, what would meet the requirements then?

KoreanAsian12 (talk) 16:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)


 * See WP:RS. But your problems go deeper. Also read WP:EW, WP:BRD, WP:OVERLINK. You made massive numbers of edits which were not helpful, and persisted in reinstating the same or similar edits when you were reverted. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, which means we need to communicate with other editors when any disagreement arises. Generally, that should take place on the talk pages of the articles where the disagreement arose, not in the edit summaries. The edit summaries are simply to indicate why an edit took place. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 17:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

I still had a source for those. Would you be able to give an example of an edit I made which was not helpful? KoreanAsian12 (talk) 18:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

and why are the edits being reverted? KoreanAsian12 (talk) 18:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Both ancestors.familysearch.org and gw.geneanet.org are social media sites, and as such WP:NOTRS. As to your not helpful edits, consider your edits to Vicente de Zaldivar (here). The source cited documents that he was born in Zacatecas. You replaced that with Pánuco, which is not stated in the reference. In addition, adding "viceroyalty of new spain" is not particularly helpful - there is only one Zacatecas, which is already linked, adding extra verbiage is simply gilding the lily. Adding qualifiers on a location is generally done when ambiguity exists or there is some reason the larger region needs to be called out, not just to be decorative. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 18:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * As to why your edits were reverted, you made a mess, and the administrator cleaned it up. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 18:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)


 * If I may jump in, I can point out two other edits which were not helpful: these edits to two Canadian soldiers, Alan Arnett McLeod and George Lawrence Price, where KoreanAsian12 changed their birthplaces from Canada to "British North America", without any explanation. Those edits were clearly wrong, factually, as they were both born in Canada, after 1867.  I reverted both edits, because they were wrong. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:40, 13 October 2021 (UTC)