User talk:Korval

C++0x
I Korval, I appreciate very much your work in the page C++0x. It start as an simple redirect to C++ and subsequently as an horrible translation of a part of my thesis. But now, thanks to contributions of the community, is a very nice article and a lot of people find it very useful. Thanks --Gildos (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of CEGUI
I have nominated CEGUI, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/CEGUI. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 03:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Gamma correction image
I noticed that you reverted my image on the Gamma correction page. Your comment, "the new image is much uglier, and renders poorly" is not exactly forthcoming as to the problem with the image. I spent considerable time and effort ensuring that the new image would match the old one very closely. With the exception of the choice of font (which is beyond my control, as it is an SVG image), I'm interested to know what in particular is "much uglier" and "renders poorly" about it? Korval (talk) 04:44, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I should have phrased that more nicely. Yes, it’s just the font that’s uglier: the SVG file uses helvetica, but Mediawiki apparently won’t render Helvetica, and whatever it chooses as an alternative is awful. I'll try to cook up an alternative right now. –jacobolus (t) 05:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay, I swapped out the font, cleaned up the text positioning somewhat, and changed the color scheme a bit. –jacobolus (t) 06:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=559947707 your edit] to C++14 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * However, C++11 constexpr functions could only contain a single expression that is returned as well as   and a small number of other declarations.

C++14
Please explain your revert of my revert of C++14. I can find no sources mentioning anywhere that C++14 was released on December 15, 2014. You said "The reference was already sited from the iso.org site.", but that's not true AFAICT — none of the references in the lede paragraph (1, 2, 3) mention that date in any way. If you're referring to a different reference I'm missing, please add an appropriate &lt;ref> tag. Thanks, AlphaPyro (talk) 17:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC).

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)