User talk:Kostaki mou

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Noticed on your edit summaries you say you had a previous user name -( I have had a name change as well) hope this new one fits you well! SatuSuro 01:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style



has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. You have done some wonderful work on the page Major/minor (tonal structure)! Congratulations -- Greenwoodtree 00:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
I have added comments to the talkpage of the Saki article in response to yours. BrainyBabe 17:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Disambiguation
Hello. Thanks for your note. What did you mean, "no harm done"? I think "Dvořák's New World Symphony" is far more correct than "Dvorak's New World Symphony". How can you say "composer Frank Martin" leads the reader to "where it should"? --RobertG &#9836; talk 06:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Lizzie Borden
I don't know if you're around these days, but if you are, there is a request for comments open at the Lizzie Borden article, which addresses, in part, issues over her name. If you'd like to comment, the link is Talk:Lizzie Borden. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Never Bet the Devil Your Head
Your contribution as analysis, specifically drawing the conclusion that Poe is "taking a dig", still constitutes original research, no matter how self-evident it may seem. Might I recommend, if you don't mind, a quick mention go into the plot summary? Also, terms like "Poe takes a dig at" is not particularly encyclopedic; it's a little too informal. --Midnightdreary (talk) 22:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I do like the term "spoof" a bit more. A third-party source would still help, I think. If it's under "Analysis" and it's not sourced, it's original research. At least, that's been my experience. --Midnightdreary (talk) 22:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

your Undo at the Deer article
There were actually two vandal edits so when you undid the last one the first was still there.-Crunchy Numbers (talk) 13:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Botany for the people
Thanks for your comment re tulip, and I agree re botanical articles generally needing some accessibility. I just commented to that end on Talk:salsify, and you may be interested in doing or saying something in response there, if it falls in your wheelhouse. ENeville (talk) 21:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I also wondered if Tragopogon porrifolius should be moved back to purple salsify. ENeville (talk) 22:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I would think so. Your saying that "Salsify" should be moved to "Tragopogon" seems to be advocating the exact opposite of what I'm saying.  The purple salsify is the vegetable, isn't it?  The main article already has a reference to that.  (You might also want to see my comment on Talk:Euphorbia pulcherrima.)  Kostaki mou (talk) 22:00, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Maybe, but who cares. Toss in your two cents, if so inclined.  I made the point there that the topic of use as a vegetable is the most basic interest, and I think this is emphasized in this case by the inclusion of multiple species in that regard, beyond just purple salsify.  It all goes to the broader point of accessibility, IMO. ENeville (talk) 16:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * See Talk:Euphorbia pulcherrima. FYI, WP:LEDE indicates that the title (whatever that might be) be placed at the earliest logical position in the opening sentence. ENeville (talk) 16:23, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

I agree with you. See my comment at Talk:Euphorbia_pulcherrima --Born2cycle (talk) 21:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Lizzie Borden
Please note WP:TPO which says "Never edit someone's words to change their meaning", such as happened here. In the late 1980s, when I visited, there were either the skulls or models of them on display. Whatever is there today doesn't change what I saw and even have photographs of somewhere in a vast pile of boxes of travel souvenirs. If you disagreed with what I said, proper conduct is to post your disagreement, never change someone else's comments. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It's all good. I knew that I'd seen the skulls in person, but it has been more than a few years now. Back then, there was no internet and it took some effort to find out what to see in Fall River. The Historical Society wasn't a very big endeavor at the time and you could only visit by appointment. The original house wasn't a B&B tourist attraction and there wasn't a lot of other things to see in the city. I was glad to go, nevertheless. It's someplace I'd always wanted to visit. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:22, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * What forum is it? I've certainly visited several sites looking for source material. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I have been to that site before, thanks for reminding me of it! I don't do enough work to contribute much of anything to a forum, but I'll look in now and then. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:31, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Netania Davrath
You know, Netania Davrath probably deserves an article written about her. A Wikipedia biography page would satisfy questions about her notability, as raised in the Chants d'Auvergne article. You willing? Binksternet (talk) 03:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Rosamunde
I have no idea what could have happened to this edit. I only opened the lead section, and only changed the internal link Op. (a disambiguation page) to Op. (the correct target page). It appears that several punctuation marks in the wiki markup (brackets, parentheses, and periods) became # marks. Thank you for catching it so quickly.—Finell 21:10, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jon Provost, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameron Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Lithuania
Hi, next time somebody treats you as rudely as Sabbatino did on that article's talk page and in reverting your edits, please ask for help from an administrator or by leaving a message in one of the forums for editors, for example one of those mentioned on Ask for help, f.ex. Teahouse. --Espoo (talk) 20:53, 5 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much. I intend to do so! Kostaki mou (talk) 15:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Mustache
Please respond to comments on an article Talk page at that page, not at the editor's Talk page - that way, other people can join in the conversation, if they wish. I've moved your comment to the article Talk page. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 12:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Oops - you did, sorry. I saw my own Talk page first and didn't look through the whole Watchlist. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 12:20, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lithuania, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 14:07, 5 July 2017 (UTC)


 * How rigid can you get? Look at a map, for crying out loud! Kostaki mou (talk) 13:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Minuetto
Dear Friend. I am sorry but if don't speak a good italian is not my responsability. "Menuetto" is no longer used and it's an ancient word. You did not know this? But if you want to use a wrong italian.... Make what you want and go on with your error! . Nobody uses "Menuetto". Is simple and absolutely ridicolous, may you understand?. Bye bye. --Ricce (talk) 09:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC) (Evidentrly you think that you can speak italan better than native italian speakers Ahahahahah!!!--Ricce (talk) 09:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC))

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)