User talk:Koten

Image copyright problem with Image:E-mpire_logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:E-mpire_logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:E-mpire logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:E-mpire logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Nnow logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Nnow logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Donald Sanchez


The article Donald Sanchez has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. &#32; The nominator also raised the following concern:
 * unsourced BLP

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Tb hotch * ۩ ۞ 19:52, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Jimmie Rivera
I deleted it three years ago because it consisted of a single unsourced line. You are more than welcome to create a new article for him. --Golbez (talk) 02:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

WEC Records

 * Ok, I'll try and explain this again, because on my end it seems fairly simple, and I've gone through it a couple of times now. The only reason, and I mean ONLY reason that WEC records are listed here is because Jose Aldo and Dominic Cruz were awarded UFC titles entirely based upon their WEC careers. Had they not entered the UFC with UFC title belts already around their waists I would have treated WEC fighters like any other UFC newcomer be it from Pride, Strikeforce, or anywhere else. But Jose Aldo was given a UFC championship because he was a WEC champion and Dominic Cruz's UFC bantamweight title fight against Scott Jorgensen took place under the WEC banner. Thus the only way to make sense of those divisions from an organizational standpoint was to include WEC records. This has not happened in Strikeforce, or any other Zuffa owned property and so is not applicable in other instances.Thaddeus Venture (talk) 17:23, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Donald Sanchez for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Sanchez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Donald Sanchez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mkdw talk 00:13, 3 February 2013 (UTC)