User talk:Kouroshbehzadian

Spamming your own journal articles
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Dear Sir/Madam,

What do you mean by "Your edits do not appear to be constructive"? Could you please let me know where and how you are indicating? Also, please introduce yourself. Thanks, Kourosh


 * We don't permit conflict-of-interest canvassing of one's own publications, as you are doing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

I agree with COI but my minor contributions to some areas are related to my expertise which is the latest and up-to-date findings that we obtained after a several years of research. In addition, the publications that I added as the evidence to my few contributions are intensively reviewed by a high quality and impact journals. I also have been a researcher at the academic and industry for around 15 years and thus, my contributions are not something that I made it up but I wanted to clarify more aspects of some scientific issues that I have experimentally done it and I am confidentially sure about this. On the other hand, it is surprising that a Wikipedia administrator instead of admiring me for this contribution, makes some comments like that "Your edits do not appear to be constructive". In addition, all these contributions has no conflict with others' research/researchers or it's not a personal opinion but it's a key finding in this area of research which could pave the way for other researchers to try similar approach on their own problems. I was uder impression that Wikiperdia appreciate this kind of contribution. I would also encourage you to have a look at the reference I added to see the quality of these references/journals. Thanks, Kourosh