User talk:Kouventa

Hello, Kouventa. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Kouventa, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. KDS 4444 Talk  20:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kouventa has been reverted. Your edit here to Kouventa was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1xbCkNaT7gPTtndVC67Dyw) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kouventa


A tag has been placed on Kouventa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 20:08, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

An answer
You said, "Kouventa is a growing show that needs help and not hindrance. There is no point in standing in the way. It does no help to anyone.". I'm afraid that Wikipedia isn't here to help entities progress. We're not here for the brand new or the up and coming - we're here for the arrived (and the past it...). Arriving can be quick or slow. When you can meet WP:WEB and prove the notability with reliable independent sources WP:RS, then is the time. We do prefer someone unconnected to write the article, but it's not compulsory. What IS compulsory, is that user names should not appear to represent organisations, products etc. Please see WP:USERNAME. I'm not blocking you - but someone else might. If this happens, it's easy (and usually quick) to get a name change. Alternatively, if you aren't going to do any editing apart from an article about your programme, you can just open a new account with a name that doesn't appear to represent Kouventa (but "Fred at Kouventa" is acceptable - if you're not a Fred, put your own name in). Please don't use this account to edit about Kouventa - and do please understand that we don't take a chance on future notability. Articles come after notability, not to help gain it. Peridon (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)