User talk:Kovkikz

Cro-Magnon
Hi, Kovkikz. I noticed that you replaced the British Isles with Ireland. I think the British Isles is more appropriate because it represents other nations as well. Perhaps "...and the British Isles, notably Ireland", or something along those lines would be reasonable. I'm not too familiar with the history of the British Isles, but I did a bit of research, and did notice that the Irish have a more complex history than others of the British Isles. In fact, it stated that the Irish are more closely related to Northern Spaniards (Basque) than with their Celtic/Germanic neighbors. Here's one site I found suggesting that. Original European  (ᴛᴀʟᴋ)  02:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Paleolithic_Man, I think it would be a little misleading to suggest the entire British Isles as possessing traces of Magnon, they were bred out in most places from what i have researched, and there is only a few pockets where you can find a substantial trace still in the blood and England and Scotland are not a part of that pocket--Kovkikz (talk) 04:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Please don't add unsourced information to the article. You need sources that meet our criteria at WP:RS and WP:VERIFY. And would you please click on Magnon which you added above and to the article? I have no idea where you are getting 'bred out', where did you find that? Dougweller (talk) 16:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

If you look at Magnon (disambiguation) you will see that it is simply another term for Cro Magnon,, and i dont think anything needs to be verified further in regards to R1b ethnic groups--Kovkikz (talk) 16:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * We shouldn't link to dab pages. And yes, anything you add about genetics should be sourced to peer reviewed reports. Dougweller (talk) 10:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! But once I get the time to learn how to cite sources the way the Wiki wants me to I'll be back to take down the crap and make sure the page conforms to the latest scientific rigor. There is no trace of the cave-dwelling, 1600cc Cro-Magnon in modern Europeans or contemporary, living homo-sapien-sapiens anywhere. That lineage died out. That the Basque's are somehow a direct descendant of the Cro-Magnons is not supported recent, peer-reviewed science and is only encountered as a national myth frequently used to justify the Basque's independence movement from Spain. Sorry to burst your master-race bubble, but Europeans are overwhelmingly descended from neo-lithic Middle-Eastern farmers who migrated there 10,000 ybp. Surcer (talk) 19:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Cro-Magnon, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 21:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I see you told another editor "there is also another Watcher of this page who is a self professed fanatic who's primal goal in life seems to be clocking up edits so he can attach the title of Master Editor to himself, please do not entice this watcher as he seems to also want to have certain facts omitted from the main article with no proper cause". I don't know what you think 'Master Editor' means but do you understand that I am not only a very experienced editor but an Administrator? Which sometimes gets in my way of my goal which is to make sure that we have properly sourced articles that meet our WP:NPOV policy, which is what I have been trying to do. As for these 'titles', which are just for fun, I am already a 'Master Editor III' and no matter how many more edits I make I cant't 'move up' until I've been here a couple of more years. So no, I'm not trying to clock up edits. Dougweller (talk) 13:20, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

In your own words I'm an Master Editor II (or Auspicious Looshpah) but if edits alone counted I'd be a Grandmaster Editor First-Class (or Lord High Togneme Laureate) but that takes 14 years. Still, in 2 months I'll be a Master Editor III (or Most Plusquamperfect Looshpah Laureate) so I've got that to look forward to! Dougweller (talk) 12:35, 23 February 2014

--Kovkikz (talk) 13:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)


 * No sense of humour? In any case, that was me making it clear that more edits don't matter to me in getting these silly titles. Dougweller (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your comments on my edit removing unsourced invitation that had a fact tag (which was removed without adding a source)
You called my removal of unsourced material vandalism. Actually it's policy, and you violated WP:BURDEN by replacing it. I'm removing it again, if you can source it then start a discussion on the talk page so we can determine whether the source can be used. You also told another editor "Can you please take a look at the Cro Magnon page, i think the editor Dougweller may also be using sleepers to try and manafacture an attempt to delete sourced information." That's a ridiculous attack, but do back it up with a report at WP:ANI orWP:SPI. You should never call anyone a puppetmaster without backing it up with evidence and startng a sock puppet investigation. Dougweller (talk) 12:34, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Cro-Magnon, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please read WP:RS - we don't use personal websites or data analysts in unrelated fields as sources for Cro-Magnon Dougweller (talk) 12:44, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Cro-Magnon. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Please see the discussion that Pinethicket pointed to. Sources must discuss the subject of the article. I've already pointed out that your source does not (and the issue with your earlier use of Ritter). Take it to WP:RSN if you think the paper is a reliable source for this article'' Dougweller (talk) 12:57, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Cro-Magnon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 13:26, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for disruptive editing and edit-warring at Cro-magnon. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Blocked again
I have re-blocked you, this time for an unspecified period. Your latest edits, especially this one, strongly suggest you are here in order to push some bizarre personal racialist idea, that you view Wikipedia as a POV battlefield between racial groups ("graciles", who should support each other in promoting pro-gracile POVs, and "disgruntled non-graciles"!), and that you wish to make the Cro-magnon article a focus of such POV activities. Under these circumstances, I do not see how we can expect any further positive contributions from you for this project. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)