User talk:Kozan Huseyin

November 2015
Hello Kozan Huseyin. I've reviewed your recent edit to m&ms. While the 400M production seems reasonable, I'm concerned that your edit summary said you found the information in Forbes but you actually cited a website that openly solicits paid articles with no clear editorial oversight. I'm not reverting the information because I don't have a better number to insert into the article, but any further information you have to support the number would be helpful. Etamni &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 07:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi User_talk:Etamni not sure if you can see this. Good point. I must have been on Forbes, then went and done research and thought I was still on Forbes. I have done few checks and found few more places quoting that fact. One a PDF on an edu domain with a reference to M&M's FAQ as a source for the information. Also in a book on Google Books search. Will also fix the Forbes reference. Thanks for pointing it out. I have also seen the reference on LA Times, and think that's the best for this fact. Let me know your thoughts and will update. --Kozan Huseyin (talk) 07:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I think that what you are looking for is the ability to "ping" someone. There are several ways to do that.  The easiest is to type  where you replace 'username' with the actual username of the person.  For example, you would have answered above with  .  Also, in order for the ping to work, you must sign your post at the same time you ping.  (Use ~ for that.)  As for the content we are talking about, any source that has a reputation for fact-checking is better than the one that was actually used here. Etamni &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 08:01, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Fantastic that is a great help :) Ok, thanks for the input. ~


 * Are you editing from a mobile device? Or did you copy exactly what I wrote?  The brackets plus the words 'nowiki' should not have been typed, but only the text as it appears in my comments above when you are not in edit mode. Etamni &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 08:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


 * In any case, I won't see your reply (if any) for several hours. Etamni &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 08:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Have a great night. Yes, I just realized. I'm on PC, but that's what it's showing. Played around with it and realized it works without the nowiki, so here it is! !!! Thanks again :) Kozan Huseyin (talk) 08:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of GS RichCopy 360


The article GS RichCopy 360 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not established.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 22:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)