User talk:Kperez1982

Your Librado Perez article may be deleted soon
Hi. I'm guessing you're probably related to Mr. Perez.

Please note that Mr. Perez has to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements -- not just anyone gets a Wikipedia article. Most folks don't. So you'll have to prove his notability using sources that meet our Reliable Sources and Verifiability rules. Stuff that's written about Mr. Perez will also have to be neutral in tone per our Netral Point of View policy. In other words, this can't be the praise-Ricardo-Perez page.

The article will soon be deleted otherwise.

If you are related to Mr. Perez, you'll also have to meet Wikipedia rules on Editing with a Conflict of Interest. In a nutshell, you really shouldn't edit that article anymore other than to correct something libelous.

So that presents a Catch 22 -- how do you fix the page if you can't edit it? Leave your suggested revisions on the article's talk page (Talk:Librado Perez) and let some other editor decide whether to make the actual change. You can also always leave me a message at User talk:A. B. to take a look at your proposed changes. --A. B. (talk) 00:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

External links -- petinsurance.com
Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, the commercial links/content you added were inappropriate, as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should not be used for advertising or a collection of external links. See the welcome page if you'd like to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thanks!

You didn't really mean to delete the link to the British Humane Society when you added your link to petinsurance.com did you? I sure hope not.

In any event, we don't allow links like the petinsurance.com link.

Linking data: --A. B. (talk) 05:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * http://www.petinsurance.com
 * Current list of pages with petinsurance.com links

Speedy deletion of Wenwer
A tag has been placed on Wenwer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Skomorokh 21:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Reply to email
Yo, Kperez1982, thanks for the email. If you don't mind, I'll reply here. As I wrote above, the WenWer article was deleted because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia cannot have articles on every website, because the content of those articles could not be verified with references to reliable sources. In order to decide which websites deserve articles, we have notability guidelines for web content. If you think WenWer meets the criteria therein – that is, that WenWer content has been republished via a respectable medium, WenWer has won a well-known independent award, or WenWer has had significant coverage in independent reliable sources, then all you need to do is provide evidence of this and we can restore your article. Hope this helps, regards, Skomorokh  02:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:WenWer Logo Small.png
Thank you for uploading File:WenWer Logo Small.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  21:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:WenWer Logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:WenWer Logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  21:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Kperez1982! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Librado Perez -

Proposed deletion of Librado Perez


The article Librado Perez has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP. Fails WP:V - nothing found to confirm any part of this article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 08:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)