User talk:Kpmoore10

In-universe
Hi - we don't write articles as if the fictional happenings are real, we treat character as an object of the narrative. I see you've spent a lot of time on the Green Goblin article - to bring it into line with our core goals - a real world encyclopaedia, most of that detail is going to have to be stripped out or extensively re-written for reasons of tone and style. Just letting you know. --Cameron Scott (talk) 21:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi Cameron, Let me just start by saying that it took me about 5 days to figure out how to post a reply to your comment and, truthfully, i'm not sure this is the appropriate way. In regards to the Green Goblin, i most certainly did not post that information to break wiki's policy on character bios. I am a very long time/well informed fan of the Green Goblin, so much so that i don't even go to the wiki page to get info on the character. i happened to get bounced to the page via another article, so i figured i would read what people have written on him. I was shocked when i saw the amount of incorrect information/incomplete explanations that comprised the page. I took the information from my own personal writings on the Goblin and posted them on wiki for ALL to be more informed and appreciate the characters longstanding history in the Marvel U. That being said, i paid no attention to the overall tone wiki uses, but the completeness of my work should not be so easily discarded. I am trying to comply to the tone that you speak of, but truthfully there are many other articles within wiki that require much more attention than my contributions to the Goblin. I am going through the process of updating my writings, but i will not be offended if others help as well. i think you will be hard pressed to find a more complete/knowledgable divulgence of Goblin lore, and for that i think we should work together to make this page more acceptable to wiki standards. again, i did not mean to offend policy, but i still hold that my work has made the Goblin page exceptionally better than what i had seen prior. thanks and good day. please reply so i know you recieved this.

keith