User talk:Kqym/Ketamine-assisted psychotherapy

Peer Review
Hello! This article looks excellent so far, great work! Below are my comments reviewing your article:


 * Readability: Very clear to me. I ran your first paragraph through the second readability checker on our dashboard, and it says it can be easily understood by 21 to 22 year olds, which is a little above our target demographic, but I also think it would be difficult to explain topics like this while being simultaneously accurate and simple.
 * Adherence to topic: All information is relevant to the topic.
 * Organization & Flow: I like the subsections that you selected, it seems logical and comprehensive. I think it would be good to include a "lead" section, though it looks like the "background" covers that role.
 * Use of images and figures: None yet, but I don't think it necessarily needs one. Maybe a figure of ketamine, if you can find it on Wikimedia Commons.
 * Proper use of citations: I think the ratio of citations to sentences is perfect, and you use the same sources multiple times which I think is a plus.
 * Paraphrasing: Looks natural and not directly quoting any one source.
 * Quality Sources: Excellent. All sources are secondary from reputable journals and most are open access.
 * Bias: I don't detect any bias. All statements are factual and supported by secondary sources.

My other general feedback is that it may be nice to include links to other Wikipedia articles where possible, which is super easy to do! Just highlight a word, select the link icon, and since most words have an associated article, you just select the button that pops up. This may help with readability too, since if you are unsure if a word is general knowledge, you can include a link so that people can read the associated article. For example, including one for the word "ketamine" would be nice in case someone wants to read the Wikipedia article on ketamine. Good luck! Qdpt (talk) 21:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)