User talk:Krasnovodsk not Turkmenbashi

September 2021
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 21:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Subdivisions of the Russian Empire
Hi, I had to revert this. It is a mess at the moment. There is two areas where people can edit articles in half finished states, one is the sandbox, the other is in draft. Either one would do before the article is moved back to mainspace. Currently as it stands can't remain. There is context into the article, and large bits of it, are unsourced. It is a mess. The table is in the wrong place. It is unacceptable in such a big article. I can send it to draft, if you want and I can move it back to mainspace once your finished. Starting an edit war, when the artilc is not ready for mainspace is not cool. If you crack on, what will happen, is I will issue warnings, I will ask for page protection and it will involve an admin. Please give me a shout if you want it moved to draft.  scope_creep Talk  23:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * What you have done is so-called cut-and-paste nove: You removed text from one article and brought it to another article. This move does not preserve the editing history and therefore is a copyright violation. Never ever do this again. If you want metarial to be moved, first seek consensus at the talk page, because I doubt that such consensus exist. Soon, unless you get indefinitely blocked before, you will become confirmed user and will be able to move pages properly, using the move tab on top of the page.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Foolish strategy.
 '''Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.''' If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at  with your username and appeal. Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).