User talk:Krator/Archive/Archive 6

Hi Krator
Hi, I was wondering if you could take a peek at the way the article [Potter's House Christian Fellowship] is being edited. The User Darrenss is a disgrutled former church member and shows obvious bias if you view his history. He also attacks any site associated with the group deleting key links and nominating pages for deletion. I was wondering if you could check it out to see if he can be blocked or perhaps the articles made to be more 'neutral' and not just hate pages. Apreciate it. Thanks. Sapienz 11:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

talk page message acknowledged
I can see you are the ever vigilant gaurdian of the Supreme commender page. Woe betide the person who vandalises your page. Good work! --Simpsons fan 66 23:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Lol. Have you considered joining Wikiproject Strategy Games? --Simpsons fan 66 07:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

New Wikipedian needs help in understanding your comment
Hello Krator, I would like some clarity on what you meant by spam links being inserted. I do not want to jeopardize my account. I believe there has been a mistake. What is the difference betweek the link that I put in and the link that was already there on Bicycle rack that was not removed?

I ask because I have already inserted links in other places before your warning and I want to know if I need to go clean them out.

Please advise, thank you! Nakoshi 20:41, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for help in understanding your reasoning. I will be sure to go back to the other pages I linked to and remove the links. I will read the resources you gave me as soon as I have the chance, the information is appreciated! I did a lot of reading about Wikipedia before I started to contribute - it is such a huge site it is hard for a rookie to find all of the relevant information. Thanks for helping keep Wikipedia clean, and get some rest! Nakoshi 19:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Missing tilde
Sorry about that, guess I'm used to typing four instead of five tildes...;) Dreadstar †  23:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

SP edit revert
Hi there :) You reverted my edit to SP citing the lack of a source. In fact the source I used for this information was the very same source already cited for that part of the article (no.55 if I remember correctly). Could you be a bit more specific? Thanks :) Edders 22:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The article cited nowhere mentions any reaction of GamePro Australia on the controversy surrounding their review, but your edit did. The bribery allegations need to be something more than a forum post to be mentioned here, as they could be potentially damaging - even as allegations. --User:Krator (t c) 22:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Mixed up the gamepro and other article. So if I put the information back in (minus the bribery nonsense) with the gamepro oz citation would that be acceptable? Edders 23:55, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I cannot guarantee beforehand, as I do not know the citation you are talking about. If it is a reliable source, go ahead. I like additions to the Supreme Commander - I would not have put in all the effort to make it a featured article if I did not like that. User:Krator (t c) 20:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Floating bar
Hee, jou oplossing is inderdaad beter dan die van mij. Heb 'm ook toegepast op WikiProject Video games/Peer review. Groetjes, JACO  PLANE  &bull; 2007-08-17 23:29
 * Een probleem is dat het niet mooi is op een resolutie anders dan 1024x768, omdat de sidebar fixed width heeft, en in mijn oplossing de "skip to.. " bar een width van 67%. Op een hogere resolutie zal er dus een groot gat tussen de sidebar en het andere element zijn. --User:Krator (t c) 11:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Oblivion Development FAC
I've responded to and attempted to resolve your concerns; I hope I've addressed them to your satisfaction. Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Geuiwogbil (Talk) 09:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

The Netherlands
I totally agree with you turning back the changes in the Amsterdam article. However, you could have made it easier on 91.105.217.110 by explaining that: (1) you followed the Dutch rules for capitalization; and (2) even under the Dutch rules "the" under certain circumstances becomes "The", (a) at the beginning of a sentence, or (b) if it stands alone (for example on a sign in front of the Dutch delegate in a UN meeting). -- Iterator12n  Talk  00:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Re:Vandalism on Amsterdam
what did I do to amsterdam? --

No problem, from 125
Okay, I signed in. You can thank me with my name now. :) - Knossos (TNC)