User talk:Krause noah

February 2016
Hello, I'm Thewolfchild. Your recent edit to the page Nimitz-class aircraft carrier appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, you can the help desk.  'Please note that "Supercarrier" is indeed a word. See; http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/supercarrier -  the WOLF ' child  21:17, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Attention user, "corrected information" has been found at multiple sources.
 * April 2016

The word "Supercarrier" is not found under word-check assigned to Wikipedia, which is most certainly on which the basis of Wikipedia's regulated standards, which are updated as often as possible. If you have a problem with these standards, please see-Policies and guidelines -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krause noah (talk • contribs) 20:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Surely you saw the BIG NOTICE on my talk page, that clearly states; "if I have replied to you on your user talk page, please reply there and not on my talk page". And so, I have moved this here, where it belongs. Now, I don't know what "word-check assigned to Wikipedia" you're talking about, but we have an article here titled Supercarrier. If you have a problem with that word, I suggest you bring it up at WT:SHIPS, the project responsible for all boats here, or WT:MILHIST, the project responsible for warships. Complaining to me will accomplish nothing. That said, I don't think you'll get very far with your complaint. As pointed out above, the Oxford Dictionary recognizes "supercarrier" as a word, with that spelling. Perhaps give some IT people a call and get your "spell-check" looked at? Anyway, if you choose to reply to me further about this, post your reply here. If you can't respect the simple request on my talk page, you won't be permitted to post there at all. (and why are you complaining about this 2 moths later?) . Lastly, don't forget to sign your posts. Have a nice day. - the WOLF  child  20:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your editing...
...is problematic. In the 2 months since you joined, every single edit you've made to article space has either been deleted or reverted as basically nonsense, and the last edit you made, to my talk page, was a rude, unsigned post in which you clearly have no idea of what you're talking about. Almost 6 weeks ago, I added a 'welcome' template here to your talk page. It has many useful links to helpful information for new users such as yourself. You obviously haven't read through it yet, but I strongly suggest that you do, so that you can contribute more effectively. As it stands right now, you are essentially not here to build an encyclopaedia. To continue contributing, you need to demonstrate an minimal level of competency. You also need to learn the basics of editing, such as adding neutral content, supporting it with reliable sources, checking your edits before saving them, and adding an edit summary to explain any edits you make. Any significant changes to articles should be proposed on the article talk page first. If they're worthwhile, a more experienced editor will add them for you. If they're controversial, you will need consensus to add them anyway. On talk pages, always remember to be civil and sign your posts. I have linked several important policies and guidelines here in this post, I strongly encourage you to read each and every one of them and work towards improving your editing. If you continue to disrupt the project, you will very likely be blocked from editing. Anytime you need assistance, you can ask the help desk. You should also check in with the Teahouse, a resource for new users. If you find you are having difficulty grasping any of the basic fundamentals here, you could also seeking a mentor through the Adopt-a-user program. Again, please consider all this advice carefully if you wish to continue being a part of Wikipedia. Sincerely, - the WOLF  child  21:12, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Checkuser ✅ socks include:


 * All are blocked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yep, but only after all of these accounts repeatedly vandalized my talk page with juvenile nonsense. Suffice to say, this user is no longer welcome to post on any of my user pages. Seek attention elsewhere. - the WOLF  child  01:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)