User talk:Krauss/Archive 1

user:krauss/digito

Your English
Is great apart from the few spelling mistakes. Don't worry about requesting that somebody checks it on the page. Make all of your changes and then post to the talk page and ask for somebody to check your changes. Keep up the good work. --GraemeL (talk) 17:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Shiny thing!
Don't think all of those good edits can go unnoticed. --GraemeL (talk) 02:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Copy of Shepherdson-Sturgis sent to xkraussinode@yahoo.com
I hope the paper gets to you. If not reply here. It is a very good paper -- esp. Appendix A.wvbaileyWvbailey 18:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

You should have received a bunch of papers -- Minsky, Post, Lambek, Melzak. If not let me know. wvbaileyWvbailey 17:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, all the papers, thanks a lot! -- Krauss, octuber 2006.

Turing machine article and wvbailey
At this time, I have completed my contributions to this article. Is there more is to say? If you have ideas, let me know. wvbaileyWvbailey 03:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks... and sorry not collaborating, I will do this next year... now have time only for Template system/Web template. -- Krauss

More copies to kraussinode
I have sent you .pdf copies of the following:
 * exerpt from text Boolos-Burgess-Jeffrey (2002) -- their use of the "abacus machine"
 * exerpt from text Minsky (1967) -- brief but useful, his "program" (counter) machine model
 * Cook-Reckhow (1973) -- famous RAM paper, more or less defines the RAM but is derived from Hartmanis and I suspect also from Melzak (1961) (with attribution)
 * Hartmanis (1971) -- RASP
 * Elgot-Robinson (1964) -- 1st paper to define RASP

I have the famous paper of Schonhage but this needs to be scanned and it is not particularly interesting excepting for how he atomized his RAM1 model to RAM0, ending up with a model that has no parameters at all (excepting maybe the goto); he also specifically uses a true "index" register "n". His models are very specific to his "storage modification machine."

Excepting the Germans (Kaphengst, Hermes, etc) this should be all the "foundational" papers. The other interesting paper is van Emde Boas which categorizes all the types of machines (I have followed his pattern). If you want to see it let me know. I will have to scan it.

These papers form quite a library, don't they? ... If we were to publish them in a "source book" we would need to permission from their publishers. And we need the Germans and Rozsa Peter, translated. I also have very lucky find -- an exerpt from the mimeographed lecture notes of Martin Davis (1973-4) that names and defines the Post-Turing machine model. wvbaileyWvbailey 17:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Deleting articles
Hi there, you left a note on Template system/Draft for the article to be deleted, which should be carried out shortly. In future, please do not leave a page like this as this gives the false impression there is an article there when there isn't. Please either move the article to a new title, redirect it to another article or have the page deleted by an administrator (in this case, you could have placed db-author on the page as you were the only contributor). Thanks, and happy editing, mattbr30 14:46, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Coordination game
Hello, I started a thread regarding your addition at Talk: Coordination game. ~ trialsanderrors 22:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:URI_URL_URN.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:URI_URL_URN.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rjgodoy 22:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Template system formalism/FAQ
An editor has nominated Template system formalism/FAQ, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. &mdash;Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-23 10:35Z 

Image:Xslt_ex2.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Xslt_ex2.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B 03:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Standard
I have reverted standard to a reasonable version. There is a discussion topic started on "de jure" to clarify this common term. Please lets not get into an editing war on this. Lets try to cooperate to get a good article on this important subject. Rlsheehan (talk) 16:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

hi
Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Multiple "votes" are sockpuppetry and prohibited
You appear to have "voted" twice, for a merge proposal that you appear to have created yourself. Based on this edit by the IP editor User:200.153.155.90 to your user space, and based on similar edit patterns. I don't think it's to much of a stretch to assume that the other IP editors agitating for merge and copying material to Standard were also you. "Voting" multiple times is sockpuppetry. I asked here on Talk:International standard if the IP editor were you, but received no reply. Do you have any response now? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry leave to grow your doubts, see my reply --Krauss (talk) 01:44, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Your English seems fine to me. It really would help if you consistently used your account to make edits, to avoid the type of situation that we are now in. I think you may not understand that Wikipedia is about consensus, not about voting. Regardless, your friend who is not an editor really doesn't get a say in what happens on Wikipedia unless he or she participates themselves. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

LexML
There are a good article at pt.Wikipedia. We have problems with english, and started the the english version with a stub and a copy/paste english terminology... But the english article was deleted. We need a good translator to restart LexML english article...

OLD Alerts
LexML

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of LexML, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.lexml.de/mission_english.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of LexML A tag has been placed on LexML requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Scjessey (talk) 17:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008 Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Scjessey (talk) 17:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of LexML A tag has been placed on LexML requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Scjessey (talk) 17:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:ClientSideTemplates.gif
Thank you for uploading File:ClientSideTemplates.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:29, 14 June 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:29, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Web template hook styles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Web template hook styles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Web template hook styles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geospatial topology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shim (spacer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RMN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mustache (template system), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Template engine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Remember ...

 * About_Valid_Routine_Calculations and Essays in a nutshell

File:State diagram 3 state busy beaver 2B.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:State diagram 3 state busy beaver 2B.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2013 (UTC)