User talk:Krawczyk Kamil

May 2019
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 15:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)


 * MrOllie I do not add inappropriate links to Wikipedia. I do not add links to personal websites. I have seen Wikipedia's guidelines - there's nothing wrong with this particular link. Moreover, you have deleted it 2 minutes after I had added it, so maybe you didn’t have the chance to fairly judge the content. It takes 6 minutes to read the whole content, so please look at the content first, then decide if it is spam / advertising a product. Also, I would like you to know that it was never my intention to put links in this article for my personal gain or for the benefit of a particular company, and I do value Wikipedia’s unbiased, encyclopedic approach. Please take a thorough look at the content again and if you still find it inappropriate please let me understand it.
 * Content from the link explains in a very detailed way how communication between LwM2M Server and LwM2M Client looks like. There are also diagrams and graphics there (which should be added here as well) that visualize the text which I believe is desired and helpful in terms of encyclopedic knowledge. On top of that, the company that wrote the article I linked to is an active member of OMA (the authors of LwM2M standard) and participated in creating this very standard. What’s more, the company also wrote an article about LwM2M on Wikipedia in Japanese (from scratch), which further proves their contribution to spreading the valuable knowledge about the protocol.

To sum up, this link is not spam and should be included in Wikipedia because it is high-tech supplement of this particular article about LwM2M. :I suggest using some of the diagrams/graphics of theirs as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krawczyk Kamil (talk • contribs)


 * I didn't have to read it again this time because I remember it from when you spammed these links on your last account. - MrOllie (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

MrOllie Sir, I beg your pardon, but I think your response does not answer the problem we're dealing with. If I understood you correctly, you claim that the link I added is inappropriate. You have not, however, explained the nature of its inappropriateness.

I, on the other hand, think it's appropriate, and I've tried to explain why. Please let me put it in words again: the content I linked to is a more detailed explanation of LwM2M's mechanisms, thus it is a valuable piece of information. It indeed links to a particular company's website (if that’s the reason you’re calling it spam), however this company was involved in creating LwM2M standard, which makes it a reliable source – in these terms the link I added is no different than links redirecting to OMA SpecWorks' website which are present in the current version of the article (it seems you deemed them as a reliable source).

In my opinion the article I linked to contributes to the article in Wikipedia by making it more accurate and detailed and is not inappropriate for the reasons stated in the previous paragraph. Please don’t make me guess what reasons guide you in your decision-making but allow me to ask you again to explain to me why you think the link should not be there.