User talk:KrazyKatEditor

January 2015
Hello, I'm BusterD. I noticed that you recently removed some content from South Park without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BusterD (talk) 19:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Hundred and One Dalmatians, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. BusterD (talk) 20:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at The Hundred and One Dalmatians, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: Unexplained removal of sourced content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at The Hundred and One Dalmatians. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Unnecessary plot detail
Hi, please stop adding unnecessary plot details as you have done here and here. This isn't an article on those movies, and plot details, like those you keep adding about DeVil being arrested, are of no consequence. The purpose of the section is to discuss very broadly the adaptations. Also, keep in mind that if you are reverted, your recourse is to discuss your changes and achieve consensus for them, not to keep submitting them. This is a community project, not the KrazyKatEditor show. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Submitting the same content repeatedly when other members of the community have objected, is considered edit warring, which is a practice that can result in your account being indefinitely blocked. Stop edit warring, and discuss your edits, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:29, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeated addition of Fancruft and unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  16:54, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I've re-blocked you for a week for continuing too add this material. Please seek advice on talk pages and provide sources if you want to add this sort of thing. Thanks, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  21:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (The Jungle Bunch) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating The Jungle Bunch, KrazyKatEditor!

Wikipedia editor Legacypac just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"this needs sources- does not appear copied though"

To reply, leave a comment on Legacypac's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

why?
Hi, why are you to lie that this picture are non free image from fair use? Publisher of that Totally spies picture cut the spies and copy it to own work. That screen shot is made by the publisher not originial background shot. Easy instruction: Publisher cut and copy it to own work!--Maxie1hoi (talk) 16:06, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Lion King, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: Since genre can be a subjective experience, sources are required. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Regular Show. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 22:45, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Disney Television Animation. Diff: "Uncredited" would be difficult to verify unless you had a reference. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing, specifically for your introduction of unsourced genre here and here and the introduction of a film title into a genre article here. Wikipedia is not interested in your personal evaluations of a subject's genre. Genre is a subjective experience and needs to be supported by reliable sources. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

More problems
You were previously blocked for two weeks for disruptive editing, specifically the introduction of unsourced genres into articles, which you have again done here, wedging an unsourced genre before a reference, when the reference does not support that genre. I also note problematic edits like this grammatical nightmare, and this unsourced genre change. Competence is required at Wikipedia. If you don't have the ability to write in proper grammar, or the ability to understand that unsourced content is not acceptable, then I will have no choice but to indefinitely block your account. This is not meant to be punitive, rather to prevent damage to the encyclopedia. Please do not submit any unsourced or otherwise problematic content again. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC)