User talk:KrazyKlimber

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Where does it say that I have a conflict of interest? Why would you think that? I have no idea what you are talking about. Ylevental (talk) 21:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You are a personal friend of the subject. That's COI. KrazyKlimber (talk) 22:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Why would you think that? Instead of reverting the article, edit it as you would any other article, or I will settle this with the admins.  Ylevental (talk) 22:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and talk to the admins. You are a personal friend of Mitchell's and I can prove it. Stop editing the article per COI. KrazyKlimber (talk) 22:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Don't post personal information about other editors that they have not voluntarily revealed. This is a form of harassment. You will be blocked if you do it again. —  Earwig   talk 22:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Guy (Help!) 16:20, 7 January 2016 (UTC)


 * To reviewing admins, see User talk:101.182.100.189. only (talk) 22:19, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Warning
There is clearly a protectionist regime going on here and a witch hunt to boot. The duck rule has been abused to effect this. The article Jonathan Mitchell isn't promotional as that IP that is NOT me claims. It's not notable. As I have been blocked for false reasons, I give notice that I am consulting my lawyers for slander by the blocking admin and reviewing admins. Delete the Jonathan Mitchell article. He's not notable. I maintain that I have not socked but you lot refuse to believe the truth. Well it will likely be sorted out in a court room now. You can re-block this account for legal threats if you want. I will not be slandered and if making the warning is blockable conduct then so be it. KrazyKlimber (talk) 01:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Your talk page access has been revoked. Your Internet-Lawyer can use WP:UTRS for further proceedings. OhNo itsJamie Talk 05:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)