User talk:Krifken/sandbox

Kate, Looks like things are coming together. A couple of quick notes. In the background section you shift between talking about the CAPS and then the Hamilton Depression Scale. I think this is relevant information to include as it provides a reference, but its phrased a bit awkwardly. Table 1 seems to track the versions of the CAPS? It's not obvious from the table what about the instrument has changed (which is fine), but consider clarifying the table title. It looks like the last two sections are still being filled out. I look forward to reading the final product. 13:37, 17 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eva.dugoff (talk • contribs)

Hi Kate, The outline looks to be in good shape. Don't forget that a Wiki article entry starts with a lead-in paragraph that summarizes what the article is about in relationship to the broader field and also summarizes the points made in the article.

While it looks like you have a lot to cover here, it might be interesting to have a general history section that includes previous versions of the CAPS as well as describing the current version.

Eva.dugoff (talk) 20:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Eva

Hi Kate, I checked in on your sandbox today. I'll check back again on Monday. Eva.dugoff (talk) 21:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Eva