User talk:Kriliokonc

Welcome!
Hello, Kriliokonc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Theta Persei did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. JaventheAldericky (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Theta persei
The edit added to the page Is a name that the star was registered under last year. The registry number is 15893-1973-1353391 on star-registration.com. Kriliokonc (talk) 20:41, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Theta Persei. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Finngall talk 22:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Theta persei
I am not doing anything wrong. Every edit I make is factual please stop deleting my edit. Kriliokonc (talk) 22:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The only authority recognized to name stars is the IAU Working Group on Star Names. Any reference to some other group claiming to have named a star is simply going to be removed. It was a long-time scam, and clearly recognized at the time as a scam, that various people "sold" star names, which were unrecognized by the astronomical community at large. Your preferred name appears to be one of those cases. If you disagree, you can always pursue one of the dispute resolution methods outlined in WP:DR. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 00:05, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

No
You can say that all you want. That organization be gone somewhere too. All of the information that they are using matches the information on the IAU state regarding the details of the star. Kriliokonc (talk) 00:12, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Began* somewhere Kriliokonc (talk) 00:23, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. --Finngall talk 01:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Fantastic
Fantastic we are going to debate this. There is absolutely no way that an organization can complain to sovereignty over something 36 light years away. I don’t care who you are how much recognition you have there isn’t no means of governing the entire universe. Kriliokonc (talk) 02:42, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Typo
Claim* Sovereignty Kriliokonc (talk) 02:43, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 02:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

That is not how this works
Hi Kriliokonc. So I understand where you're coming from, but here's the thing: We don't care. Wikipedia articles are written based on information that can be found in reliable sources. You paid the people who run a website to send you a fancy piece of paper that says you named a star. We don't care. The relevant experts for articles on astronomy are recognized international astronomical organizations and major national organizations - specifically, the maintainers of stellar registries that actual astronomers refer to in their publications. Anyone can create a website and start listing names for stars. Unless that website is a recognized reliable source for the names of stars, we don't care. I have taken the unusual step of giving your account an indefinite block from editing as its first block, but this is because I sincerely believe you are not here to help build an encyclopedia. Rather, it appears that you are here to add a name to a star that you registered yourself on some random website. If you can demonstrate an understanding of why you are blocked, or otherwise convince another administrator that you should not be blocked, you may appeal my action by adding the text to this page (including the curly braces). Please see Guide to appealing blocks before you try. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:58, 25 June 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 12:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC)