User talk:Krillzyx/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hi Krillzyx! I noticed your contributions to London Ambulance Service&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! 10mmsocket (talk) 15:58, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi
Hello there! :DD

66.60.120.202 (talk) 03:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Friendly reminder
Just a friendly reminder to always explain your edits with an edit summary. Your recent edit to Pokémon Sword and Shield: The Crown Tundra was fine as I was able to see your reasoning for undoing that user's edit, however it's always recommended to explain your edit with the edit summary. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#0001 18:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)<!--

Misleading Edit Summaries - "Adding" Content
Hi, Krillzyx. Please don't use "adding content" as an edit summary when reverting vandalism or other user's blankings since the edit summary can mislead other users about when the content first appeared in the article. I've noticed that you consistently also add a blank space into template text for some reason as well whenever you've made these edits. These are the instances when you've done so:. Snuish (talk) 17:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I see. Thank you for letting me know this could be considered misleading. My thought process was that I wasn’t entirely certain the edits were vandalism, so I didn’t want to revert them with an automatic “undo/vandalism” edit summary, so I was reverting manually and using a generic “adding content” edit summary. I’ll avoid doing this in the future. Thanks again for your feedback.  Krillzyx   (talk)   14:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Got it. I don't think anyone would fault you for using the generic undo action on edits that remove content without adequate justification. The level one warning templates are also useful in this context because they don't assume bad faith on the part of the person for whom you're leaving the warning for. Snuish (talk) 15:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)