User talk:Krimuk2.0/Archive 10

Dadasaheb Phalke Award
Whenever you get some free time, can you take a look at the FL nomination for Dadasaheb Phalke Award and put your comments/suggestions? -  Vivvt  ( Talk ) 02:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure thing, buddy. -- KRIMUK  90   ✉  02:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Sansho the Bailiff
Have you seen this film? One of the most beautiful films I've ever seen!!! Strongly recommend watching it asap, it's on youtube. Reviews here are mostly right!♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Can't say I have. Will check it out. Thanks! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  02:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

I gather you didn't like Rillington then? Heard nothing by email from you!♦ Dr. Blofeld  07:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Heyy..long time, no talk :P
Sweet! Thanks for doing that! The article looks awesome :D And I'm sorry I wasn't much help toward the end..I've promised myself not to fail another subject, which is why I'm so inactive on Wiki these days :-/ AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 09:53, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks! No issues, good luck for your exams. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  10:09, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks..good luck to you too, if you have exams :D AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 10:18, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Yay..GA!! Good work! AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 23:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey, I was wondering if you knew what IAS is...a user's asked to elaborate it on Kangana's article, though I don't know how :/ AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 00:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

FLC review request
Hi! Hope you're well. I was wondering if you had some free time to comment on an FLC I've had up for about 6 weeks. Link to article and link to the FLC It would be much appreciated. Cowlibob (talk) 13:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Done. Will be happy to support when the comments have been addressed. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  16:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

In case you're not aware
Hi, now that you have 4-5 FAs and as many FLs, you could go for WP:FT?. Rani Mukherji would be the best bet to start with. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 18:41, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * That's an excellent suggestion. Thank you. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  03:05, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

In case..
.. you didn't know, our dear friend is at it again, lol. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 04:44, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * LMAO! Well, atleast he keeps us entertained. Could you please enlighten us as to who contested Singh's birthdate when the Hindustan Times source clearly mentions it? Or will be get another random interpretation of the shiny crystal ball? :P -- KRIMUK  90   ✉  05:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * as you can see it was contested by the IP that you reverted. and as you can also see from that version there are no inline citations to any of the appearances of the birthdate in the article. If there is a Reliable source, fine, but it is the person adding the content who is responsible for adding the inline citation, I am not responsible for searching through every source to see if some other cite supports one birthdate over another.  --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:03, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If you going to revert, then yes, it is your burden to search through the source provided at the end of the sentence. But ahem, why do I even bother explaining that to you? You won't listen to me anyway. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

SRK
Hi. Before we get this guy to GA, I think we should first consider moving the article to the 3 word version of his name. I tried to contact Shshshsh, who felt strongly about the 2 word version, but he is not answering. I was going to put up an RfC, but I wanted to get your opinion first, if we will be collaborating on this. BollyJeff &#124;  talk  15:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I was also thinking the same thing. Since his official twitter account uses the 3 word version, maybe it is best we change it to that. I have his filmography list at the FAC, so will need to change that too. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  01:38, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * So I have started this task now. Maybe you can see where I am going with this article. We cannot describe all of his films, but should summarize the various sections of his film career and other work. I am going to need a lot of help. Could you maybe start working from the bottom up as I work from the top down, or do you want to split it another way? BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  14:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Yep, yep. That works. I'll start tomorrow. :) KRIMUK  90   ✉  15:48, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I am just about finished with the early life and acting career sections. I found it hard to cut very much. I also fixed all the dead links. What sections are working on next? BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  20:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey, . I'll return to the lower sections very soon. I have just been feeling very lazy. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  03:10, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I am having trouble making any progress on 'Stage performances' (needs more summary, less details), 'Endorsements' (same plus updating), 'Humanitarian causes' (too lengthy). I will look at the last three sections next, with the aim to reduce fluff and the number of sources. BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  12:46, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Saraswati Park
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Anjali Joseph
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

2003 Oscars
Hello there. I would really appreciate it if you could kindly post your comments at the FLC nomination for the 75th Academy Awards right here. I don't want to sound like canvassing, but the nomination is lacking any comments or such. I would hate to see a nomination go to waste. Your work is greatly appreciated,
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 20:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Oops, I meant to comment there much earlier. My apologies. Will take a look tomorrow. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  16:27, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations!

 * Thank you Kailash. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  08:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Kaise ho?
--  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 01:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Main badhiya! Aap kaise hai? I see you have started the Kareena Kapoor Khan filmography page. Excellent! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  02:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Main bhi theek hoon! Poochne ke liye shukriya! :) I just needed to ask you about adding "television" appearances. As you know a lot of celebrities appear on reality shows like Indian Idol to promote their films, and adding them would be ridiculously painful. However, now celebrities appear on TV serials too; for e.g. Vidya Balan appeared as herself on Bade Achche Lagte Hain to promote SKSE. Can we add something like that? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 02:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it's really unnecessary to add TV serial appearances if they appear as themselves to promote their films. However, if they play an important role, like Rani, Kareena and Aamir played in C.I.D., we should include them. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  02:18, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok! Makes sense. Would Kareena's appearance as Mahi Arora on Punar Vivah be okay to add? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 02:28, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't watch these soaps, so I don't know what her role was in it. Did she really "portray" the character, or was she just promoting Heroine?-- KRIMUK  90  ✉  02:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't watch them either, but this says that she portrayed the character. --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 02:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * LOL! These news channels are an extension of the soaps! Haha, but anyway, it does look like she "acted" in the show so it's fair enough to add it. :) Let me know if you need some other help with the list. Good luck! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  02:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Haha! Thanks dost! :) BTW would that video be okay to use as a reference? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 02:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Nope, it's not a reliable publisher. You can use this ref. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  02:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Shukriya dost! :) What is your thought on appearances on Koffee with Karan and game shows—should they be added? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 03:11, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Definitely not. Chat show and film promotion appearances shouldn't be included in the filmography page. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  04:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Hey bud! I was wondering if you could have be some help. A certain editor is going around redirecting all the IIFA award pages citing various claims instead of improving the article by adding sources himself. Some people just never learn! :( --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 02:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Another Red Pen in the making. I don't think he'll stop until someone adds some sources. I'll see what I can do. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  08:12, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ek Villain Poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ek Villain Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:50, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hrithik Roshan filmography
Hello! Your submission of Hrithik Roshan filmography at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Redtigerxyz Talk 07:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
Oh stop it, you :P How is Smaropore doing? Do you have any plans of watching the horror that is Humshakals? AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 02:36, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Haha, I was kinda hoping it would go the Besharam/Himmatwala way, so Sajid would learn never make a film again. Now he's thinking about making a sequel now -_- Did you watch I Saw A Devil? That's a pretty good movie! AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 07:14, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I had a question. In Katrina's page, the years active in the infobox is currently 1997-present, cos that's when she had her first modelling assignment, but shouldn't it be changed to 2003-present? Since that's when she became notable and "worthy enough" to have a Wikipedia page. AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 09:35, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Hrithik Roshan filmography
Gatoclass (talk) 08:17, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Finding Fanny
I was wondering if you could help me out. A guy, who says he's from the production house of the film keeps reverting my edits, and instead has produced |a very vague synopsis of the film that is apparently from the production house. Isn't that copyrighted material, meaning it's not allowed? AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 06:11, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

This is not copyrighted material. This is the media one-liner that is being sent out to everywhere, and can be used across platforms. Prithviraj2002 (talk) 06:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * "Sent out to everyone" by whom? -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  06:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

By the official PR team to the media. Like I have asked the other contributor : who is their source of information for the synopsis ? Where has this been verified? I have also clearly mentioned that the detailed official media synopsis will come out in the next few days when the trailer launch happens. In case there are any more queries, please refer your queries to the official PR team : hemanshu.mistry@in.foxstarstudios.com. Hope this clarifies. 07:16, 4 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prithviraj2002 (talk • contribs)
 * Okay, so I have removed the plot section until there is an official confirmation. When the production team releases one, we can rephrase it for the article. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  07:21, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, okay. That sounds good. Thanks for your help :-) AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 07:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Akshay Kumar filmography
The above list had been nominated by me for FLC 16 days ago. You have a lot of experience and expertise in dealing with filmographies of Indian actors so I would by glad if you comment on the list's nomination page. Thanks in advance.--Skr15081997 (talk) 13:11, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look soon. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  12:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

 * Thanks. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  12:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Gemini FAC
Gemini (2002 Tamil film) is at its second FAC after the first one stalled due to lack of activity. It would be helpful if you post your comments on the FAC page. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Please at least give a reply. This article should not fail its FAC. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, no one wants to see their article fail. I'll comment there soon.-- KRIMUK  90  ✉  10:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for giving those comments at the FAC page of Gemini. Do please remember to strike your comments that have been resolved. And is there any minimum number of "support" tags that are needed for a FAC to be promoted? BTW, I think I should feel ashamed to do most of the work of an article nominated by another person, just because he is absent. But the main reason I'm doing most of the work is not only Sriram's absence, but to see a Tamil film article become a FA (and the first of its kind too) Kailash29792 (talk) 14:29, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I know. Since you are one of the reviewers for the FAC, you shouldn't really be doing the work. I will continue with my comments there when Sriram decides to come back. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  15:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey guys! Forgive my absence, but it wasn't intentional. My telephone cables were damaged courtesy Chennai Metrowater. Took a few days to fix them. -- Sriram speak up  09:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi! I'm eagerly awaiting more comments from you since you have said that there are "more to come". Thanks. -- Sriram  speak up  06:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay. Will comment today. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  06:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for those "final" comments. I promise they will be solved in less than 24 hours. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:50, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Hiya again! Kailash and I have addressed a few concerns. Pls take a look and lemme know if they suffice. There are still a few things that needs to be taken care of. I'll be doing it soon. Sorry for my lack of participation. I'm engaged neck deep with my academic commitments which I did not foresee. Thanks for your time. -- Sriram speak up  19:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I understand. No hurries. Let me know when you have addressed all of them. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  08:11, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay. -- Sriram speak up  13:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Krimuk, a large number of your comments seem to have been addressed. So you can visit the FAC page anytime and strike out the resolved ones. Additionally, because some unreliable ref's were removed, the ref numbers have changed. So please refresh your comments on the ref numbers (eg: Ref 89 may now have a lower number), so that we know what else to remove. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi! I believe that all concerns you raised during the review has been addressed. Pls. check back when you are free and leave your feedback on whether you think it deserves to be promoted to FA. Thanks for your time and comments. -- Sriram  speak up  11:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


 * While your comments have been marked as "Resolved" (which I also thanked you for), there are some things I think you didn't see:
 * The Cast and technical crew now share the same section (retitled "Cast and Crew") as per the wishes of nominator Sriram. Does that look fine?
 * In 2006, Saran revealed in a conversation with director S. P. Jananathan that his nervousness rendered him sleepless for four days until the film was released - this sentence has been shifted from "filming" to "release". I think that fits well.
 * Is the sentence "Because most films that released on Diwali and Pongal were unsuccessful, Gemini helped the industry recover" polished? Or can it be?
 * In which section will this sentence fit? The film was the 162nd production of AVM Productions,[10] and their first film after a five-year hiatus. Their last production before the hiatus was Minsara Kanavu (1997), the release of which marked fifty years since its first production Naam Iruvar (1947).[b] By producing Gemini, AVM became one of the four film studios that had been producing films for over fifty years.[13] It is currently in "Development". Kailash29792 (talk) 13:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Should be fine. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  03:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Singham Returns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Informal note
Hey, I notice that you have HighBeam access and you seem to have a few topicons. That being said, if you are interested, I've created. No reply to this message is necessary (and I won't see it unless you ping me), just wanted to let you know it was available. Happy editing! — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (e • t • c) 23:58, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

2014 Oscars
Hello there,

would you kindly proofread 86th Academy Awards for featured list status? I would appreciate the help very much.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 02:21, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello
You're doing a really good job keeping all the newcomers' articles up to date!! Have you checked out Nargis' Kick song? She seems to have improved her dancing skills heaps, and as always looks so HOT!! AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 08:20, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Yep, Nargis is gorgeous in that song! -- KRIMUK  90   ✉  02:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Akki's filmography
I have rephrased the first para of Akshay Kumar filmography. Can you review the first para. I have a few questions related to filmography articles;


 * Is it necessary to use the template?
 * Should the Title always be the first column?

--Skr15081997 (talk) 14:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi. Yes, please use the sortname template for names. Using "title" in the first column is not compulsory, but it's good to maintain consistency over all filmography pages. I'll try to copy edit the lead sometime this week. Cheers! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  15:38, 20 July 2014 (UTC)