User talk:Krimuk2.0/Archive 13

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 21:19, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  06:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sonam Kapoor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Financial Express. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

FYI
There is a discussion at Jimbo Wales' talk page which I think you may be interested in, I think you may be able to provide some input into it. You can find the discussion at User talk:Jimbo Wales--5 albert square (talk) 03:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

First Kamal film
Hi Krimuk90, I am pleased to inform you that my GA nomination for Aval Appadithan was passed straight (without any changes being asked to be made). The film is the first Kamal Haasan film and the fourth Rajinikanth film to be given a GA status. Ssven2 (talk) 04:17, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Congratulations! Getting a straight pass from is no mean feat. -- KRIMUK  90   ✉  05:27, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Imsai Arasan 23am Pulikesi
This is the debut film of comedy actor Vadivelu as hero (lead role) and is also the first historical film done in Tamil cinema after 28 years. Would you be interested in conducting a GA review on this film? Ssven2 (talk) 16:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I am not taking up any GA reviews at the moment. Maybe something else later. Good luck! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  03:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * David Oyelowo
 * added a link pointing to Variety


 * Foxcatcher
 * added a link pointing to Variety


 * Gone Girl (film)
 * added a link pointing to Variety


 * Into the Woods (film)
 * added a link pointing to Variety


 * Selma (film)
 * added a link pointing to Variety


 * The Grand Budapest Hotel
 * added a link pointing to Variety

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Precious again
  Indian cinema

Thank you for quality articles as part of the Indian cinema task force, such as Vidya Balan appearing on her wedding day, stressing her courage "to step beyond the boundaries imposed by a male-dominated Indian film industry", and for your ẆẺḶḈỘṂẾ, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC) Two years ago, you were the 334th recipient of my  Pumpkin Sky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Julianne Moore
Hi Krimuk! As you probably know, I've been absent on wikipedia for ages, but I started thinking that I should come back and update the Julianne Moore article, since she's had a couple of major releases since I left and is looking to be a dead-cert to win the Best Actress Oscar for Still Alice. But I checked today, and see that you've been doing a great job at keeping it up-to-date. So I just wanted to say thanks for doing that: it's nice to know someone else cares about her article. Cheers! -- Loeba (talk) 19:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks . You have done such a fine job on the article, it would be a shame to not keep it up-to-date. I really hope Moore wins the Oscar next year. She was remarkable in Still Alice. Have you seen the film? Also, I'm really glad to see that you are back. I hope you intend to stay. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  02:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yep I've seen it, she's superb and single-handedly makes the film if you ask me. It's looking like she'll definitely win the Oscar, she's getting all the buzz. It's just like Cate Blanchett last year - no one else has a real chance. It's about time too! Not sure if I intend to stay right now, heh, I think it's unlikely if I'm honest but we'll see :) -- Loeba (talk) 17:46, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah! It's about time. She has been snubbed all too often. I thought she deserved to win for Boogie Nights and The Hours. And it was shocking when she wasn't even nominated for The Kids Are Alright. Anyway, better late than never. :) Glad to see actresses like Moore, Bullock and Blanchett changing the game for actresses in Hollywood. I really hope you decide to stay. You are an excellent editor and we need editors like you to work on film-related biographies. -- KRIMUK  90   ✉  02:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan
You asked why there was so much IP activity on this article.

The reason is here: WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Greatuser.

Greatuser was the principal contributor to this article and warred with other editors over minor details. Now he continues IP editing in this article. He certainly uses other socks elsewhere, just nobody has patience to chase them - just see the sheer size of his sock farm: WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Ali Mohammad Khilji/Archive
 * Oh, yes, I do remember dealing with this user on Vidya's biography. Thanks for the information. I think I'll request for the page to be semi-protected. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  10:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Krimuk90. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 06:54, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Seasonal Greets!

 * Thank you! Wish you the same. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  07:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

PK
Have you seen the film? Ranbir Kapoor makes a surprise cameo. It felt like a lost battle in the climax. You havent replied to any of my email lately. Do reply— Prashant 14:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC).
 * No, I'll be seeing it over the weekend. And I did reply to each of your emails. Aren't you receiving them? -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  03:43, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

No, I haven't received any reply to my mails.— Prashant 15:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * That's weird. I even replied to your email this morning. Check your spam/junk folder. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  15:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Got it. Auto Sync was off. So, I was not getting any notifications.— Prashant 16:13, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Puthiya Paravai
My nomination of the film for GA has passed. This is the fifth Sivaji Ganesan film to get GA status! — Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Seasonal Greets!

 * Thank you! Wish you the same. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  10:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Vikram filmography
Hi! I have nominated the list for FLC and I invite you to review the nomination and suggest improvements, if any. Here is the nomination page. Thanks. -- Sriram speak up  12:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey again! Just to remind you that you had earlier began a c/e of the article before you pulled out it citing that you could not find time. You then told me that you would rather leave comments at the FLC. Now that the list it at FLC, hope you could lend your expertise and help me in improving its quality. Thanks in advance. -- Sriram speak up  12:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for you constructive criticism. I have rephrased and reworked most of them, taking current FLs as reference. Pls. take a look and comment further. Regards. -- Sriram speak up  17:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Could you kindly update the FAC page so it's easier for me to understand which comment you have addressed and which you haven't? -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  05:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure. Check after an hour. -- Sriram speak up  06:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

I have improved the prose quality to a large extent. Pls. take a look and update your comments at the FLC. Btw, the lead might look longer. But, I have discussed only 19 films among his 50 films. The contents are pretty much the same. I have just broken them into smaller paras. -- Sriram speak up  18:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The article is shaping up well, courtesy you comments. Btw, it would be better if you could strike-out those comments that you feel have been addressed. So that, we can both concentrate on the others. Thx. -- Sriram speak up  07:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I need a small clarification. When you said that "names should be sorted last-name first", which are the columns that you were referring to. Coz, as per WP:FILMOGRAPHY, the title of the film or television program should be invoked via sortname, where appropriate. Considering that these titles aren't in English, I wonder if it is appropriate and necessary. Pls. enlighten me.
 * And, if you were referring to the 'Roles' and 'Directors' column: I'm still not sure if sortname if applicable. If these name involve a second name or a family name as in Khan, Kapoor, Malhotra, Varma, Kumar, Mukerji, Bannerjee, Chatterjee, Reddy etc., then it might be advisable to use sortname. So, will it be sufficient to use sortname only for fields with such entries? -- Sriram speak up  13:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Sort his directors' names by their last name, where applicable. Same for his roles, where applicable. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  02:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi again! I believe I had addressed most of the concerns raised by you. Could you spare some time and update the FLC? Thanks. -- Sriram speak up  10:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

TRPoD
Hi, this is to inform you that for the first time in his long career here at Wiki, TRPoD has been blocked. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)


 * It won't stick, looking over the contribs it is offbase. We'll see it will be at ANI or AE at anyrate. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:28, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yay! Very well deserved, and long overdue!! :)) He creates a terrible and hostile atmosphere on Wiki and it's high time he takes a break to ponder on his behaviour. As one of the users on the ANI said, he's a bully. Sums it up perfectly. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:16, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * On another subject take a look at [] do you think it's possible this is Smauritius again? I was thinking it might be but could you keep an eye on the page?> Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:12, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Quite likely, given her obsession with birthdays. I'll keep an eye out. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  02:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

FLC review
Hey there again! I notice you also have a list up at FLC right now. Would you like to review Featured list candidates/List of New York Islanders draft picks/archive1 for me, and I'll review your list? Not sure how many hockey lists you've reviewed, so if it's not a topic you're comfortable with I'd understand!  G loss  21:29, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, as you rightly guessed, I have absolutely no knowledge on the subject, and would probably do a bad job at reviewing it. I'll pass it for now and maybe review something else of yours later. But it would be great if you would take a look at my nomination. :) Cheers! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  02:16, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Humpty Sharma Ki Dulhania Poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Humpty Sharma Ki Dulhania Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for List of films released by Yash Raj Films
Harrias talk 03:49, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Congrats!
Hi congrats on your recent FLC. I hope my one passes, too. You're such an amazing user. It was nice working with you on Vidya's awards list. Hope you continue with your Indian work :) -- FrankBoy (Buzz) 18:49, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the kind words, and good luck on your list. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  01:54, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

67th Academy Awards
Hi there,

I was wondering if you could proofread 67th Academy Awards for featured list consideration. I would appreciate the feedback.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 09:46, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Birdie, long time! I'll definitely try to look at it sometime this week. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  10:21, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

standard publicity
"Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines" - there is nothing "notable" about the same pre release promotional publicity and gossip about this film. It is the routine "coverage" that EVERY production manufactures.

also WP:AAGF -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  04:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * So, what does "notable per the notability guidelines" mean for upcoming films? It means that the production and filming has been covered by reliable sources. And in this case, several such sources have been provided, and thus, it does meet the notability guidelines. :) Also, I don't understand what you mean by "EVERY production manufactures". Film production is not a manufacturing business. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  06:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * it means significant coverage of a non-routine nature by third parties. something outside of the standard "manufactured" publicity coverage of "oooh look where we are filming" and "coverage" of rumors of which celebrities may or may not be involved and reports about/quoting those celebrities who are involved giving the standard promotional blurbs about how wonderful their upcoming work is/how difficult the shooting schedule was/how honored they are about working with such a "veteran". --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  13:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * LOL. Actually your personal opinion makes no difference. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * It is not "my personal opinion", thems the policies and guidelines, as you can see by the links, and reviewing the standard promotional coverage for the hundreds of films that litters the pages of the entertainment press. --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Films that are well-covered by reliable sources are notable, as per the links you so kindly provided. Now it's not upto you to decide which is "standard" and what is not. Wikipedia does not work on your personal preference, please remember that. You cannot implement policy based solely on what you think it says. Discuss and contribute constructively, please. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you read the links? Unreleased films that have more than WP:ROUTINE coverage could have an article. The pre-release promotional press is routine coverage as is clearly obvious from the fact that the hundreds of films get the press blurb when they start filming and the stars almost without exception go on publicity junkets. What would be non-routine is if that DIDNT happen. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * What would be non-routine? Please provide some examples. Also, the coverage of each unreleased film will obviously be "routine". Next you will say that films that haven't released shouldn't even have a Wiki article. The last time you tried to do something similar, we all know what the unanimous consensus was. So is this a case of sour grapes?-- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

WP:NPA
Please stop making unfounded accusations about other editors as you did  --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Please stop bullying me based on your personal preference. I am here to improve articles not slaughter pages based on my preference. Please respect the contributions made by other editors. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, my saying that you bully me is not an attack. You bullying me is an attack. So please stop! People come on Wikipedia to contribute not to be bullied. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Deepika Padukone
What if I'm changing the image? Image isn't objectionable as well as it's on the page also. That 2012 picture was looking a bit old so therefore I just swapped it. What's the big deal! Don't be so hypocrite as it's not your property. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Improvingthepen (talk • contribs) 15:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Discuss on talk page before changing an image that was kept after a prior discussion. Also read WP:NPA. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  16:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi!
You're funny :P I wanted to contribute to the discussion on your page, but I honestly have no idea what he's even saying now AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 00:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Haha, thanks! I think a different language is needed to speak to people who take pleasure in negativity. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  03:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Lol! I think (I stress), I THINK I may have found you on Facebook. Do you mind if I add you? AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 11:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Ya sure, but I don't want to give away any personal info on Wiki anymore. I have learnt that the hard way. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  11:48, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, hopefully it is you :P AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 00:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

PR request
I have opened Peer review/Akshay Kumar/archive1 and invite you to leave comments on how to improve the article Akshay Kumar. Your experience would be of great value. Thanks.--Skr15081997 (talk) 08:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  11:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have some time, also look at this.-- FrankBoy (Buzz) 12:48, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  13:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Reliability of Oneindia.com
Oneindia.com's reliability is being discussed at Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Can you comment there. Thanks.--Skr15081997 (talk) 04:13, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Vidya Balan filmography
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Help!
Hey there! Thank you for your recent help in my FLC and copy-editing and many more things. I just wanted to ask for your help. I find this source really helpful for my Wiki work but it does not have any page number or I can not see it anywhere. Do you know what to do? -- FrankBoy (Buzz) 21:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey, you can use this google books citation tool. It will fill up the page number automatically. Just copy paste the page link from the google books viewer. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  01:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

FLC request
Hi. Hope you're well. Was wondering if you'd be up for reviewing another one of my filmographies? Article: Julia Roberts. FLC link: Featured list candidates/Julia Roberts filmography/archive1. Thanks. Cowlibob (talk) 13:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

duplicative
if it is cited in the article, then it is already appropriately covered. we dont need to provide additional promotional coverage to non existent products. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Why do we have a lead then? Why do we have a filmography table then? If you think that it's not needed, garner consensus for all articles and remove ALL filmography tables in each and every actor article. Do not target one page and impose your personal preference. As usual, you will not reply to this. At best, you will leave a snide sarcastic remark. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:07, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * A lead is a summary of the article, which is why we provide them for long articles.
 * And you are most definitely wrong, a GOOD editor will remove duplicative content from the body of an article as well as removing content that gives WP:UNDUE weight to items. (such as equal weight to non existent items as to actually existing items.)-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:11, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Red Pen, I'm yet to encounter a situation where you've actually been right about something. Leave him alone.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

FL
I would be glad if you review this. Thank you friend. Have a nice day!  Jim Car ter  07:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  13:50, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks
I am not aware of where you found that style of listing GAs and FAs on your user page. But it was lovely and i too used it in my page. My sincere thanks for the idea and an equally sincere apology if it hurts you in any possible way. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Not at all. You are welcome. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  12:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Would you like to conduct a GA review on Naayak Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I am not taking up any reviews at the moment. Sorry, maybe something else later. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  01:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Rowspans
Aah! Did you really say? Was it mentioned there? I am sorry, I didn't see it. I will surely not add rowspans in filmography articles again. But, why don't we add it? What is the reason? Isn't it more efficient to combine the years, rather to write them all over again 5-5 times? Kindly inform me. Kashisharora11 (talk) 14:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, Kashish. Thanks for the message. Your query is understandable. There is an essay on accessibility here that talks about the limitations of adding rowspans. Cheers! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  01:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Sivaji
The article is undergoing a GA reassessment. Would you like to post your comments on it here? — Ssven2  speak 2 me 05:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe not. I'd rather stay away from topics I don't know much about. Cheers! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  06:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you so much. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  13:25, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Is Oneindia.com WP:RS? -- FrankBoy (Buzz) 17:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I thought there was a discussion on it's reliability somewhere. However, I have never used it before, as I always thought it wasn't reliable. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  02:45, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Haha. Thanks. It still doesn't make a difference to him. He'll go on with another "Madam Chopra is a goddess and everyone else is a piece of shit" rant again! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  02:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

This may be humour for you Vensatry, but it is an insult to me. So, dont say you are very clean people. Huh.— Prashant 14:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No, I took a bath today! :D -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

You think this is funny? I cannot understand why you are so much against Chopra? I dont care if you dont like her. But, why this partiality and hypocrisy? You should be neutral towards everyone, which you are not. I am born stubborn and will go to any length to fight this injustice on this wikipedia.— Prashant 14:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Please provide a WP: RS. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

That Shero thing was perfectly sourced. But, its not the sources which please you. Its your mind as you like to only see what you want to see. You are a working man and I am still studying. Otherwise, I would have given all your answers in each and every discussion and rant. I dont have time to fight as I have a life outside Wikipedia, which you dont have.— Prashant 14:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No personal attacks please, or else you'll be blocked once again! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Okay. So when you say that I dont have a life outside wikipedia its funny and humourous and when I say the same it bcomes attack. Uff. God Bless You.— Prashant 14:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * When did I say that? Provide a link. Also, if you want to discuss about the fluff on Madam's article then comment on her article's talk page, or else stay off my talk page. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, Krimuk's pointing out your behaviour is certainly undeniable &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Mrigayaa
Have you seen this film? &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 07:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yup, I saw the film when I was probably 8 or 9. Though I don't remember much, I do recollect the great performances! You've seen it too I presume. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  08:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No, I've not seen this till now. :) In fact, I was aware of this only after I started editing WP; the title caught my attention. As expected, it looks like a complex narration of a simple story, just like other art-house productions. Mithun was too good as a new comer. Can you tell me if the synopsis is correct and make the necessary changes? From all that I've read, I could understand only the outline of the film, as the themes were interpreted differently in many sources. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 08:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Haha, sure, I'll try to, though I really don't remember much of the plot. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  08:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)