User talk:Krimuk2.0/Archive 26

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 11:39, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 12:32, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vicky Kaushal
The article Vicky Kaushal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vicky Kaushal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 08:22, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Vicky Kaushal GAR
So sorry I took so long, Krimuk. Been a bit busy with real life. I've posted a few comments now and I'll look at the sources and images tomorrow. Do get back to me once you've resolved the comments I've posted at the GAR. Thanks. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 17:55, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Posted some further comments regarding the sources. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:27, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Your article on Vicky Kaushal has been promoted, and he's placed right next to his mentor, Anurag Kashyap, in the list of BLP GAs. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:07, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Would you also do me a favour by posting some comments at Kailash29792's Peer Review (PR)? Its a 1978 Tamil film, Mullum Malarum which is considered to be a breakthrough for Rajinikanth as an actor and protagonist as he was mainly into antagonist and supporting roles at the time. The link for the PR is right here.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:21, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, . :) I'll leave my comments at the PR soon. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:21, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Netflix Ozark.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Netflix Ozark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Peer review/Kal Ho Naa Ho/archive2
Hey there, Krimuk. How's everything with you? Good I hope. Btw, I've just made my latest attempt at FAC starting with this PR of KHNH. I would really appreciate it if you drop by and post a thorough review and constructive comments. Do let me know if you are willing to do so. Thanks. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 16:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

And P. S. A gentle reminder on Mullum Malarum's Peer review. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 16:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Anything further to add on KHNH, bro? — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:56, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I got nothing else, good luck. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 15:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks man. Saw Uri today. The Josh is pretty high for me today particularly with my masters degree getting over today.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:09, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, congratulations, and all the very best for your future endeavours. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 15:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, Krimuk. I plan on working on Devdas next. I'm thinking of taking it to GA first and I would appreciate some help as well. I was hoping if you could lend me a hand and we can work together on it for a future FA.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:20, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I can peer-review and make edits when you are done expanding it. Let me know. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:46, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

PR request
Hi Krimuk, long time. I am trying my first stint at FA quality article. For that I have opened a peer review on an article I have worked extensively. Please leave your comments if interested. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:14, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Wish
Hello. Please remove the Facebook link in the external links for the article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you. 27.74.247.140 (talk) 08:53, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Ignore this sock puppet: Sockpuppet investigations/Haiyenslna – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:25, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dinesh Vijan
Template:Dinesh Vijan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- wooden superman  09:59, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Aaj Kal listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aaj Kal. Since you had some involvement with the Aaj Kal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Joseph  💬  15:40, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

What was discussed
In this edit your edit summary refers to "what was discussed." I see no such discussion on the talk page. Could you clarify where this discussion took place? WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Here's the discussion. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:35, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review for Raja Harishchandra
Hey. I hope you are doing well. I have started peer review for India's first feature film Raja Harishchandra here. I am planning to take it to FAC in the near future. However, I dont have any previous experience with FACs so thought of putting PR first. I would appreciate if you can put your comments. - - Vivvt ( Talk ) 08:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Krimuk
Hello there, Krimuk. How's everything with yourself? Good I hope. I really hope you are doing good here and outside of Wikipedia.

BTW, I've nominated this film article about a poignant yet funny love triangle starring Shah Rukh Khan in the lead. The link for the FAC is right here. As always, if it is not too much trouble, you leaving comments at the FAC would be most welcome and beneficial to the overall improvement of the article. Thanks. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Just a gentle reminder btw.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:01, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
You are most welcome

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC) 

Kate Winslet
Hi, I just came across your FA article on Kate Winslet and want to compliment you for doing a very good job. Not only did you recap all her roles, but you put soul into the description and made me feel like I understood her personality and career choices. I don't see that in so many other actor articles; now I know why it's an FA! Keep up the great work! Yoninah (talk) 20:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , thank you so much. This really made my day. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your recent edits on Millie Bobby Brown
Hi there. I recently noticed that you undid my editions in that article. I'd appreciate it if you'd tell me what policy I'm not following. My editorial intention was only to summarize the article a little, and update some sections (Filmography). Thank you. Best regards. -- Mia o w   13:02, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I've left adequate edit summaries. Cheers! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -- Mia o w   14:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Natalie Portman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Other Woman ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Natalie_Portman check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Natalie_Portman?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Natalie Portman lauds
Hello again! I just wanted to say that you are doing an awesome job with the Natalie Portman article. She has always been one of my favorite actresses so I look forward to reading through the article once you have completed your work so I can learn more about her. Your work on here is very inspiring. Aoba47 (talk) 01:54, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you kindly, . I'd very much like to hear your opinions for improvement once I'm done. They have made most of the articles I have worked on so much better. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 05:58, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I would be glad to help :) Aoba47 (talk) 00:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Please change Vidya Balan Wikipedia cover photo
Please use Vidya Balan's new photos from Dabbooratnani's 2019 august photoshoot, it's really better in Vidya Balan Wikipedia cover page,  plz change Vidya Balan Cover Photo from Wikipedia Ayisha123 (talk) 08:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Amaury and ownership
Amaury is the definition of WP:OWN. Revert, revert, revert, all covered with a veneer of rules lawyering, followed by pinging his Scoobie gang to gain "consensus". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8F8:1F20:7A3A:2:1:ECEE:C3DD (talk) 16:03, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I know. Blatant BRD misuse, but it's a losing fight. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 16:05, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Call for collaboration
Hi. Khayyam needs some Krimuk magic. Please help to fix the issues pointed on In_the_news/Candidates so that this may proceed. Credits will be shared. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  10:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey, I'm not really familiar with his work, but let me see if I can find some good references. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:53, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Kate Winslet
Hi Krimuk, hope all is well. This is currently listed at WP:TFAP for October. I'm working on a blurb at User:Dank/Sandbox/1, but you're welcome to do your own blurb if you like. - Dank (push to talk) 17:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . The blurb looks really good. I'll probably make some tweaks closer to the main page appearance day. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:53, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I left out the Grammy award ... it felt pretty minor. Otherwise, tweak at will. - Dank (push to talk) 12:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Infobox Images
Hey, I recently noticed you undid several of the infobox images I uploaded as "most recent" is not the criteria. As I am a new user, what and where is the criteria for infobox images? Thank You! Chickensarebleepssorryuncle (talk) 17:15, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, the infobox image needs to be the best representation of the subject and should be technically well-produced. "Most recent" is not the criteria. We need to select a high-quality image of the subject in which he/she is best recognisable, and which doesn't have extraneous elements (such as large blank spaces around the subject) An image clicked 4-5 years ago, in which the subject still looks like he/she does now, is absolutely fine, unless there has been a significant change in their appearance. Also, it's best to discuss an image change in talk page to avoid conflict. Cheers! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:35, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Kate Winslet scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Kate Winslet article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 5, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/October 5, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We also suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors up to the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Filmography Standards
Hi Krimuk2.0, I'm a new user here and yesterday I was just playing around with some simple formatting. You reverted some of my changes from rowspan back to individual line items. I couldn't find anything on the standards for this beyond that it is acceptable to use rowspan for filmography years. Any insight would be appreciated when it is acceptable to use it or not. cruiser721 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cruiser721 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

War poster
Your giving reason is not good and baseless. Please give me the full explanation about stick to old poster. Sush150 (talk) 09:32, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Waiting for your reply.u didn't reply me then I will revert again new poster. Sush150 (talk) 14:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , Krimuk was being clear enough: don't upload another poster until the release date changes. How was that so hard for you to understand? -- Kailash29792 (talk)  14:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Kailash29792 I understand your feelings but u are giving poster dimension reason always. Already it was looks good but u always change. Sush150 (talk) 18:22, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Your posters do not look good Sush! How would it look if this became this? You Sush150 are simply bad at math, stretching posters to fit your desired style without scaling properly. Just change the width, and the height will auto-arrange. Krimuk, is there anything wrong with my poster uploads? I don't distort files the way Sush does, and I don't keep uploading new posters unless the release date changes. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  06:51, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * For the love of humanity, listen to Kailash, . His poster uploads are absolutely fine and there's no reason for you to tinker with them. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Kailash29792, yaa I know some posters are stretch but, not all. And edit all posters without any reason.

Krimuk2.0, you giving me reason not upload new poster if release date was changed but I was upload the new version of poster with all movie cast in one poster. I was trying to upload better for article. Please this time help us I will not upload new versions in any article if release date was not change.
 * I really don't understand your motivation. Who is "us"? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Please, I will request you to stay new poster not old one. Sush150 (talk) 03:03, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you today for Kate Winslet, "the ingenue in that big-boat movie, ... the pedophile Nazi in that Holocaust movie, ... the brainwashed Australian who pees on herself, ... the mother who is erotically spoon-fed a peach cobbler by a convict, ... the girl with the blue hair in that "what-really-happened-in-this-movie" movie"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:00, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Revert posters
I was noticed u to always jump to middle to revert the posters. Firstly u revert War film poster then Bala and now Marjaavaan. It's your hobby to revert edits?? I now to stick only one poster but there is new posters are coming and i am always trying to upload best poster. So what is wrong now. Sush150 (talk) 09:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , that's where you're wrong! You shouldn't keep replacing the poster simply because you think the new one is "better"; maybe if the new poster announces changes in the cast, crew, title, release date or something, then it can be used. The other example is, if the first was a teaser poster like this, and the new poster is more detailed like this. Krimuk, am I wrong anywhere? -- Kailash29792 (talk)  09:53, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

I'm not sure how many times we'll have the same conversation. I'm not going to repeat myself. Just stop fiddling around with posters and more importantly, stop edit-warring,. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Kailash29792, The poster was character first look and then i was updated new poster with full cast and also relevant to film's subject. Sush150 (talk) 10:57, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Addition
Hello please add Bachchan Pandey to Kriti Sanon's career section. The official announcement happened recently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4055:94:38B0:0:0:2651:28AD (talk) 13:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 15:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Emma Stone
Hi there, instead of going back on forth on her history I just wanted to come here. The Template:infobox person says the partner parameter is for "unmarried long-term partner" and ""partner" here means unmarried life partners". Her fiance is neither. They are engaged to be married which takes him out of the "unmarried partner" category, wouldn't you say? Once they do get married he would obviously go in there as her spouse but shouldn't be before. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * IMO someone she's been with since 2017, and is now engaged to, does seem to qualify as a "long-term partner". That's more significant than a marriage that lasts for a few months, isn't it? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:49, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 2 years doesn't really seem like a significant amount of time tbh. Like Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell - they are long term unmarried partners. But since Emma and he plan on getting married, I wouldn't consider him an "unmarried partner", you know? Before they got engaged they were just in a relationship and he wouldn't go in the infobox then so why would he go in it now just because they are engaged? If and when they get married, he'll go as the spouse. Even if they only last a few months, they are still going through a legally binding ceremony which I take as more significant. I wouldn't mind getting other editors opinions if need be. I just try to go by the templates parameters and when I see "unmarried", it just doesn't include fiances since they are going to get married. LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I see your point, and I too wouldn't mind a different set of opinions. Cheers! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * ,, , hi all - since you've made recent edits to Emma Stone, would you care to weigh in on the subject at hand? I can always take this to her talk page and rFc if need be. Let me know how you'd like to proceed. Thank you! LADY LOTUS • TALK 18:22, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I understand where both sides are coming from here. Personally, even if there is an engagement, I wouldn't include a partner in infobox prior to marriage unless they already have been together for at least 5 years and/or the relationship has led to a pregnancy. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 19:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I hear you, but I think traditional ideas of commitment are changing, and our editing should reflect that. Not all couples consider marriage and/or having children to be the only form of legitimizing a relationship. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:40, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I second you Krimuk2.0, because Stone and Dave McCary are officially engaged so the infobox warrants that. Just look at Oprah Winfrey, who has been engaged to Stedman Graham since 1986. On an unrelated note, should the lead even read Emily Jean "Emma" Stone? Isn't Emma a diminutive that should be removed per WP:HYPOCORISM? <b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  08:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:43, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Preity Zinta
Hi Krimuk2.0,

Requesting you to make the following changes

1. Filmography and awards The filmography and awards section is not up to date. Can we add the following movies which she has acted in:

Selected filmography
Krrish (2006) Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna (2006) Jaan-E-Mann (2006) Jhoom Barabar Jhoom (2007) Om Shanti Om (2007) The Last Lear (2008) Heroes (2008 film) (2008) Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi (2008) Heaven on Earth (2008 film) (2008) Main Aurr Mrs Khanna (2009) Ishkq in Paris (2013) Happy Ending (film) (2014) Kaadhal Vennila (2016) Ivan Oru Thunichalkaran (2017) Bhaiaji Superhit (2018)

2. New career moves, hiatus, and launch of PZNZ media (2007–13; 2018) In the last section, we have a negative comment on the movie Bhaiaji Superhit(2018) (Following a five-year sabbatical, Zinta starred opposite Sunny Deol as an aggressive Varanasi-based wife in Neeraj Pathak's action comedy Bhaiaji Superhit (2018).[85] Ajit Duara of Open magazine called the film a "rude, sexist, and completely mixed-up farce" and bemoaned that the "once vivacious [Zinta] appears completely disinterested in her surroundings and in her co-actors".[86])

Requesting you to update with Subhash K Jha's review of the movie. Who is a much-renowned critic and a more reliable source. Subhash K Jha of Times of India magazine called the film Goofy Zany and Outrageously Fun[2] (Following a five-year sabbatical, Zinta starred opposite Sunny Deol as an aggressive Varanasi-based wife in Neeraj Pathak's action comedy Bhaiaji Superhit (2018).[3] Subhash K Jha of Times of India magazine called the film Goofy Zany and Outrageously Fun[4])

KevinThomas71293 (talk) 10:11, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

FLC review request
Hi Krimuk, hope you're well. I wonder if you'd be able to review Anne Baxter on screen and stage, Featured list candidates/Anne Baxter on screen and stage/archive1 another of the series of filmographies on actresses that I've been working on. Cowlibob (talk) 13:56, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Know any Telugu-speaking Wikipedians?
Hi Krimuk, do you happen to know of any Telugu-speaking Wikipedians in the circle of film editors? I'm trying to verify some content asserted about Raghava Lawrence as detailed here, but nobody has responded yet and I don't want to forget about this. Thanks and sorry for the hassle, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Not a hassle at all, . Pinging and, as they might speak the language or know someone who does. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry Krimuk, I don't know Telugu. And Ssven is on an indefinite hiatus. and  know the language, please ask them . <b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b>  (talk)  07:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you Krimuk and . Your help is much appreciated! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * He runs an old age home and the plight of an old woman, abandoned by her son, moved him. Most of the interview, where he spoke about his personal life, was about the experiences he faced at the old age home. That's all what i could infer from the interview. And regarding his lineage, all i could know was Poovirundhavali in Tamil Nadu is his father's hometown (through an article in The Hindu). <b style="color: brown">Veera Narayana</b> 05:36, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you much for helping me out! At 14:00-ish, does he say anything about being Telugu? I'm trying to figure out if this guy was lying to me when he said that Raghava Lawrence says that he's Telugu. The same editor also pointed me to two articles that did not actually make this claim, so I feel like he might be taking me for a ride here. May I please trouble you to double-check around that time stamp? Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:35, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * No such claims made in the video. No other reliable sources found with such claims to the best of my knowledge. Regards, <b style="color: brown">Veera Narayana</b> 13:58, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, ! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:52, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Krimuk2.0!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Krimuk2.0, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
 * Thank you! Happy New Year to you too! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Half Million Award for List of Emily Blunt performances

 * Thank you! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Hi Krimuk, I hope you're well. Happy New Year and best wishes in 2020! Moisejp (talk) 20:48, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! Happy New Year to you too! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Chhapaak poster
Then please remove the leading male actor name in starring and close the discussion. And 3 revert rule is not applicable for u?? U did also 3 edits naa.. Sush150 (talk) 05:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Related to awards on an article
Hello Krimuk2.0, are Screen Awards notable enough to be mentioned in the introduction as in the article Manisha Koirala. Please do give the reason. Thank you Priyamal21 (talk) 08:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The award is notable enough on it's own, and can be mentioned if there's not an overreliance on listing her awards in the lead. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

New message from DBigXray
 D Big X ray ᗙ  11:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you
Hi, I just wanted to drop by to thank you for updating some of "my" articles. I haven't been the most active in the past two years so I lose track of some of them sometimes. FrB.TG (talk) 11:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Haseen Dillruba film article
The article redirected to colour yellow productions. The filming was started now. Sush150 (talk) 07:07, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Umm ... what?
What does You didn't "apparently missed it in my scan" -- you missed it, period. mean? I don't remember why I missed it, so I said that I "apparently" missed it. Maybe I accidentally clicked on the wrong link and was looking at a completely different article, or maybe I Ctrl+Fed "dual" or "citizen" but misspelled it without noticing and so couldn't find it; in the former case, it wouldn't really be that I missed "it" (i.e., the relevant text) so much as that I was reading the wrong source.

Also, what does Also, talking down to a fellow editor for correcting that mistake is not in good-faith editor mean? I assume "editor" is a misprint for "either", but I didn't "talk down to" you or anything; I requested you comply with a universally-accepted basic editing policy.

Furthermore, please refrain from communicating in edit summaries, particularly responding to other editors' messages on your talk page in edit summaries that blank their messages; it makes further response and/or request for clarification very difficult, as it gives the somewhat intimidating impression that other editors are not welcome on your talk page. My apologies if it was your intention to convey this message to me, and if so I will stay away from this page in the future, but you need to refrain from attacking other editors on your talk page if you are not going to allow them to respond.

Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 09:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Listen, you made a small error and I retrified it. Happens to the best of us. There's no need for any explanations from either you or me. The only reason why I removed your message is because I didn't see a point in that particular conversation, when we can all make better use of our time here. No intimidation tactics whatsoever. Cheers! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Florence Pugh
Hey, Krimuk2.0! After reading the New York Times article regarding her residence, I now realize I have made a mistake in interpreting the article, as it states that she is living in London instead of as of whatever time was documented. I'd like to apologize for this error. Thanks! KyleJoan talk 02:18, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, Oscar day brings forth so many surprises. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Why is what I said a surprise? KyleJoan talk  02:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Coz receiving an apology from some people is harder than it's out there for a pimp. I must be luckier than Pitt and Dern today. Damn damn damn! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Ha. Nice callback. I have no problem apologizing when I've done wrong, truly. In regards to Pugh, I'm sure you agree that she's going to get more nominations and even a win sooner than later. Happy Oscars to you! KyleJoan talk  02:37, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Most definitely. She's marvelous! <3 Krimuk2.0 (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Some peaches for you!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:9px;" class="plainlinks"> Sdkb has given you a bowl of peaches! This delicious and typically non-allergenic fruit promotes WikiLove and has hopefully made your day juicier. Spread peachiness and WikiLove by giving someone else some peaches, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, by adding {{subst:Peach}} to their talk page with a friendly message!

Thanks for your contributions to Parasite! - Sdkb (talk) 07:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Reverted Edits on Katrina Kaif
Hi Kirmuk2.0, you undid my edits on Katrina Kaif article, while my edits were well sourced. In question of adding her Entrepreneurial-ship in introduction paragraph, i stated she is also an Entrepreneur and why this information must not be in starting para?  D My Son  06:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Because the opening line should only mention her primary profession -- the one which makes her notable, per MOS:OPENPARABIO. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:53, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Emilia Clarke picture
Hey Krimuk2.0, hope you are well. I saw your suggestion at Talk:Emilia Clarke. I think it would be great for those images to be available on Commons. If it isn't chosen as the infobox image, I think it would be great to be included within the prose. Let me know what you think, thanks! --   LuK3      (Talk)   18:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey, will do! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:00, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry I didn't notify earlier but I uploaded them to Commons, see commons:File:Emilia Clarke (49589951248).jpg and commons:File:Emilia Clarke (18550365053).jpg. I included the former in the article. --   LuK3      (Talk)   16:51, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, thank you! I had forgotten about it. Sorry about that. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:20, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Sathi Leelavathi
It is my latest FAC. You can either make comments, or do copyediting as suggests. -- <b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  09:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * In case you overlooked this, I'm gently asking you again. -- <b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  15:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Baaghi?
Hi Krimuk, sorry to bother you, but do you know anything about the Baaghi series? I'm unclear on what the main characters' names are. Here Sukhjeet04 changes two characters surnames from Choudhary to Chaturvedi. Here an IP changes character names from "Pratap Singh" to Choudhary. I'm further confused by this and this, which says Pratap Singh, but I also see Chaturvedi. and I haven't had luck finding "Ronnie Choudhary" in the context of Baaghi. Any idea what to do here? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I have no idea about this series, sorry. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

hello
I'm having issues with a user that you too had had issues with, kylejoan. I don't want to prejudice getting your opinion so I'm not going to say which opinion I hold, but looking at their page it's apparent they believe that pages must be the way they want them. Period.

There's actually 3 request for comments and the bottom one is mine. I'd appreciate it if you'd weigh in if you care to take the time. thx.

The top one is at: Talk:Nicolle_Wallace. ImUglyButPrettyUgly (talk) 12:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Move Back page to Hotstar from Disney+ Hotstar
Hi Bro! I guess they are trying out a bunch of things! Instead of availing the app to Beta Testers they have made it available for all people. However the fuss is clear and they have rolled back the changes, so it's better we can sit on Hotstar only till the official announcement comes from Star India. Saichaitanya4496 (talk) 14:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , you're absolutely right. Krimuk, see what you can add. -- <b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  15:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Communication is a two-way street
Hi Krimuk, re: I think it's important that you be willing to discuss your reversions with Krish. I understand your concerns about the Priyanka Chopra article being scrubbed of criticism, but this project, fundamentally, (as you know) is a community process, and if you aren't willing to do the D in BRD, then that's kind of a problem. It's not fair to other editors to stonewall changes and then refuse to discuss your objections. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:46, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * "not fair to other editors to stonewall changes and then refuse to discuss your objections." Is that what you think I'm doing? Wow. But no, that's what I did. I told them to get off my talk page because their message was more of the same old accusations. Discussions need to take place at the article talk page (about the content, and not me), where I have previously participated. As for the repeated removal of anything negative from her article, I think I've said enough about that at the ANI, and I'm not fond of sounding like a broken record. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 16:22, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * User talk:Cyphoidbomb long history here that would make it more difficult for Krimuk to keep doing that, but it is something that has to be attempted at least a little. From his viewpoint, as I assume and have observed, is that very little has changed with Krish. I don't have such an entrenched view but I can certainly understand why it might be difficult to try and do those discussion ad naseum years later. I think Krish means well ultimately, but doesn't express it always in the best ways. One last aside Krimuk, is and has been, a model wikipedian. I have a major amount of respect for whaqt he is trying to accomplish in these articles. These articles in particular are promotion laden like I have never seen. He wades through the nonsense and does make it balanced. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much, Hell in a Bucket. It's been a tough task, but a positive word from someone like you helps tons! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Future FL
Hi Krimuk, hope you are well. I'm currently working on List of awards and nominations received by Emilia Clarke and hoping to nominate it over at WP:FLC soon. Would it be possible to take a look over and see what needs to be improved or worked on? Thanks! --   LuK3      (Talk)   22:32, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me. I made some minor tweaks to the prose. One point: do we need to mention her salary in her awards page? That seems more relevant in her main biography. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Just reminding you about my FAC, Krimuk. If you're not interested, never mind. But form of reply is better than none. <b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b>  (talk)  06:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Pretty sure there are better editors who can help you. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)