User talk:Krimuk2.0/Archive 6

Million Award
The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

As many as Paris LOL!! I have another film, The Great Ziegfeld for you to review if you're interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)‎

I'm just
So fucking dead at this :D :D — Indian: BIO   · [ ChitChat  ] 11:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It's disgusting! Lol! -- smaro jit  HD 13:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

62nd Oscars
Hi there.

I was wondering if you will be could proofread: Featured list candidates/62nd Academy Awards/archive1. Please note that because of some limitations on older Oscar ceremonies, this list follows the 1st Academy Awards format done by User:Tbhotch rather than others such like the 82nd Academy Awards and such. I would be grateful for the extra help and support. Thanks.
 * –Birdienest81 (talk) 18:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deepika Padukone
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Deepika Padukone you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- 16:10, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

City Lights
You might be interested in reviewing this one.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I am. It's one of my favourite films of all time. -- smaro jit  HD 01:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Deepika Padukone
Wow, bro! You blow my mind at how committed you are! 6 hours back-to-back on her page! Anyways, good work and good luck! :D I might check over the article when I can for any errors :) AB01 (talk) 11:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC) -Break ke Baad got mixed not mostly positive reviews. -The Housefull review talks about the three ladies together, and I remember before a Race 2 review mentioning both Deepika and Jacqueline's performance was reverted before here, so I think this is a better review since it talks specifically on Deepika's performance. Is that alright? AB01 (talk) 06:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, I changed the article a bit, though this was reverted by you before. But, I think it should be ok like this because:

Thanks :) AB01 (talk) 11:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'm sorry AB01 (talk) 06:27, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yep, I understand, mate! AB01 (talk) 06:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) I'll ask if I need help. Yeah, I know...there's a lot of work needed on that article...only the Career section is adequate so far. I don't know if I'll get time to work on it anytime soon tho. So behind in my uni work!! Procrastination is my middle name, hahaha. Btw, what's with the name change? AB01 (talk) 06:44, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Yay! Deepika's an FA article. Great work, dude! :D AB01 (talk) 02:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you. Much appreciated. :) -- smaro jit  HD 09:58, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Padukone is looking excellent seems ready for FA on what I've read so far, but I'll continue to go through it and make minor edits and additions. Can you review Hooray Henry for me? It is only a slang term, but seems to now be of reasonable quality and comprehension.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Having trouble emailing you, I've had a few Mailer Daemon messages last few days.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:09, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, I just received your e-mail. Did you get my reply? -- smaro jit  HD 16:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Jessica Chastain pic
I'll get consensus. Lady Lotus (talk) 14:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure. :) -- smaro jit  HD 14:18, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Archiving
I see u r using WebCite to archive the URL's in Deepika Padukone to avoid dead links. But I also think u r aware that WebCite is at the verge of being shut down, because of which even the archived links may disappear? Pls try using the Wayback Machine as an alternative. I am not commanding u, I'm just bettering the article's chance of becoming a FA. Kailash29792(talk) 05:00, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for the message. Actaully, WebCite is not shutting down but will stop accepting new admissions (that is, if they don't get enough funds). Either way, the archived links will stay. Cheers! :) -- smaro jit  HD 05:03, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Just curious
What does HD mean? You are definitely not available in High Definition. -  Vivvt  ( Talk ) 23:58, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hahahaha, oh I am definitely available in High Definition. :D -- smaro jit  HD 04:45, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I believe you meant 3D. :D -  Vivvt  ( Talk ) 04:49, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * LOL, yeah 3D too. And sometimes even IMAX!! Hahhahaha. -- smaro jit  HD 04:54, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hahaha. Include Dolby and that would make it a perfect combination. Btw, What does HD mean anyway? -  Vivvt  ( Talk ) 05:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * It actually means High Definition, nothing else. Was just trying something new with my signature. :) -- smaro jit  HD 05:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Gotchu\a. Am I the first or only one to ask this stupid question? :O -  Vivvt  ( Talk ) 05:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Lol, you are the only one who asked me this no-so-stupid question! :) -- smaro jit  HD 15:11, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Congrats on the recent success. Btw, whats 90 now? Are you a 90's kid? ;) -  Vivvt  ( Talk ) 20:18, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much. :) Yep, I am a 90's kid! -- kri muk  90 02:48, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Yay!! Thank you. -- kri muk  90 16:29, 13 October 2013 (UTC)r


 * :)♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:11, 13 October 2013 (UTC)


 * You're on fire bud! Congrats to you and Blofeld! :) --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 21:37, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Dreamz. :) -- kri muk  90 04:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations!

 * Thank you so much. :) -- kri muk  90 13:57, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Next stop, TFA?
Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of Deepika Padukone to FA status recently. If you would like to see this (or any other FA you may have helped to write) appear as "Today's featured article" soon, please nominate it at the requests page; if you'd like to see an FA on a particular date in the next year or so, please add it to the "pending" list. In the absence of a request, the article may end up being picked at any time (although with 1,335 articles in Category:Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page at present, there's no telling how long –or short! – the wait might be). If you'd got any TFA-related questions or problems, please let me know. BencherliteTalk 10:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much Bencherlite. Actually, an article that I have contributed to (Vidya Balan) had previously featured on the main page. So I am kinda aware of the rules. But, thanks again. :) As for Padukone, I have left a message on User talk: Dr. Blofeld's page regarding a suitable date for featuring this one. -- kri muk  90 02:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

 * Thanks a lot! :) -- kri muk  90 02:06, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you so much. :) -- kri muk  90 12:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem :) AB01 (talk) 09:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Pr
Hi, Could you do me a favor please? As I have opened a PR for Vidya Balan's awards and nominations list I wanna drive it towards FL so I need your helpful comments, Thank you. —FRAN KY! 20:26, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, I will try to comment soon. -- kri muk  90 03:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Retirement
Hey Krimuk (new name?), hope you are alright, and also congrats for your FA success on Deepika Padukone. Anyways, I will retire on Thursday, because I don't have time to edit Wikipedia and also greatly lost interest. But don't worry, I will return, but don't know when. Thanks for being such a great and kind friend.--Jionpedia  ✉  18:59, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Very sad to hear that, but I wish you all the very best and hope that you decide to come back soon. Cheers! :) -- kri muk  9003:42, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Don't you go and retire on me as well!♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:33, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Aww...I am definitely not retiring. :) -- kri muk  90 01:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Good news!
Good news! Monsters University has passed the GA review!--<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ED791A 0em 0em 0.8em,#F55220 -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#1D6B00 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#000000">Jionpedia <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ED791A 0em 0em 0.8em,#F55220 -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#1D6B00 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#000000"> ✉  11:46, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Many congratulations. I loved the film. :) -- kri muk  90 01:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Katrina Kaif
Heyyy! I was wondering if you could help me with something in her article..in the Namastey London section, I've wrote:

Despite these films doing well at the box office, Kaif's roles were overlooked as the general perception from critics was that the films did not allow "much for the women to do" and that Kaif was "nothing more than [a] glamourous prop" in her appearances.

I couldn't find ONE reference speaking collectively on these three films (and how she was just eye candy in these movies), so I was wondering if these references were the correct way to go. What do you think? AB01 (talk) 10:30, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I know it's hard finding "one" reliable source for such claims. I had a similar problem with the Padukone article. It's fine the way it is now...but try looking at other articles. I'll try to look at Google Books and Highbeam too. -- kri muk  90 01:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) AB01 (talk) 04:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

What's this kreepy name?
That's a peculiar name, krimuk! Sounds like krimi.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:54, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * LMAO! Krimi. That's just hilarious. Krimuk really doesn't mean anything. It just sounds funny, so changed it to that. :P -- kri muk  90 01:24, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 19:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

Ranbir Kapoor
Whether it is on the lead or at the end, content showing such type of hyped and promotional content  leading actor of contemporaryHindi cinema as it is their on Ranbir Kapoor require strong and reliable source. First provide the source and then revert the edits. THanks.. HRM (talk) 11:07, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * No it doesn't. Read WP: LEAD. -- kri muk  90 15:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Skagen
Hullo amigo. Hope you're not too busy with RL but can you review this one for me? It's very comprehensive I think and of good quality.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:49, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry Blofeld, I don't think I will be able to review this. So sorry, will review something later. -- kri muk  90 12:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, no worries.♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Krrish 3
and I are there, need you too. Have you seen the level of you-know-what there?  Sohambanerjee1998  13:36, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Yep, I am there. :) -- kri muk  90 15:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

61st Oscars
Hi there,

I read your comments about the 61st Academy Awards for featured list candidacy. I promptly addressed your comments by denoting that Richard Williams was acknowledged for work on Who Framed Roger Rabbit. Thank you for your comments.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 01:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Deepika Padukone
Hello. Since you were involved in the article's FA nomination, I thought I should let you know about mythread. Thanks and keep up the good work! ごだい (会話) 17:03, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Katrina Kaif
You should oppose, your merist on the talk page, i should not, i am contributing on the article, with relevant and accurate sources, it is you, who disagree/dispute about the factual content. Stop reverting it, talk about it before reverting, [Please] thank you so much. --- Smauritius (talk) 11:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * That doesn't make much sense to me, but I would request you to stop copying sentences from other articles as you didhere. Cheers! -- kri muk  90 11:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)