User talk:Krimuk2.0/Archive 9

Needed your opinion
Hey Smaro! I needed your opinion. On Kapoor's article, it currently mentions that JWM established her as a leading actress of Bollywood, but I came across sources that state that it was back in 2001 that she became a leading actress (primarily due to the success of MKKH and K3G, as well as her performance in Asoka) here, here, here, here and here. Do you think we should change it? If we do, we'll have to re-write the lead as well. This is what I have come up with so far. --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 19:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey, I agree with you. The re-write is very good and I think it will be fair to change it. :) -- kri muk  90 04:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for work on Aamir Khan so far! Would love to collaborate with you on that one. :) BTW, I don't think it makes sense to have the "production and direction" section since most if not all the films have featured Khan in them. We can incorporate it into his career section and also state that he produced it, etc. --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 21:19, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I completely agree bud! At this point, it's going to be extremely tough to find sources for Khan's old films, but I'll try my best. BTW, I thought a consensus was already reached for adding films in production to an actor's filmography. What's all this fuss about now? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 01:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey bud, please feel free to revert if you don't agree with my edits on Balan's article. I just thought it was helpful to have the years and remove the 09 image as it was making the career section look cluttered. --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 03:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Welcome to Koffee with Rahul! Haha. I can sure give KJo a run for his money. LOL
 * Rank in order of acting talent: Deepika, Kareena, Katrina, Priyanka, Vidya (Kareena, Vidya, Priyanka, Deepika, Katrina)
 * Rank in order of acting talent: Aamir, Hrithik, Ranbir, Salman, Shahrukh (Hrithik, Ranbir, Aamir, Shahrukh, Salman)
 * The number one actor and actress today (Ranbir & Deepika)
 * An over-rated actor and actress (Salman & Katrina)
 * Who has a brighter future: Alia, Anushka, Parineeti, Shraddha, Sonakshi, Sonam (Parineeti & Alia)
 * Who has a brighter future: Aditya, Arjun, Ranveer, Sidharth, Sushant, Varun (Ranveer)
 * A film you think was over-rated (Chennai Express)
 * A recent film that you saw that you liked/hated (Lootera & The Lunchbox; GTPM & Chennai Express)
 * Vidya's best performance/film (Parineeta/Kahaani)
 * Your top 5 favourite films within the past 10 years (2003-13) (The Lunchbox, Omkara, Taare Zameen Par, Barfi & Black) --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 04:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Indeed, my friend! Why don't you come up with some more questions? ;) I always used to play these games with Shahid. --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 05:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You're good! LOL :) For number 4/5, I know you asked for one, but it was too hard to choose. I've listed two! :P
 * The one name that pops up in my mind: Preity Zinta
 * Priyanka in Barfi!
 * Ranveer in Lootera/GKRRL
 * Mr. Bachchan - his entire filmography... LOL. But my personal favourites are Black, Paa & Agneepath; Aamir: Lagaan & DCH; SRK: MNIK & Devdas; Ranbir: Barfi; Hrithik: Lakshya & KMG; Ajay: Omkara & Zakhm
 * Madhuri: Mrityudand & Pukar; Sridevi: Lamhe & Chaalbaaz; Rani: Black & Saathiya; Preity: Heaven on Earth & KHNH; Kareena: Omkara & Chameli; Priyanka: Barfi & Aitraaz
 * Silsila: a similar film was already made (KANK) so I would retain the same cast; Mother India: some classics are better left untouched and I can't imagine anyone doing what Nargis did; Lamhe: Hrithik & Kareena; Arth: This is a definitely tough on. It would be interesting to see Vidya, Farhan & Priyanka; HAHK: Ranbir & Deepika
 * Deepika, Katrina, Priyanka, Anushka & Sonam
 * SRK & Salman
 * It's been a while... but I would say Omkara
 * Ajay Devgan/Akshaye Khanna & Urmila Matondkar
 * Now it's your turn to answer these questions! ;) --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 15:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Shukriya dost! :) --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 15:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Not yet... been really busy! What about you? I've been hearing good things about Queen! --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 01:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Congrats bud! :) BTW, who gave the better performance in Gulaab Gang? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 01:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know if I have told you but I have a huge crush on Juhi... LOL :) BTW, I don't quite like the current pic used on Rani's article – she looks really tired. She looks much better in this or even this one. What are your thoughts? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 17:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Hoping to catch it this weekend! :) BTW are you good with removing watermarks from the Bollywood Hungama images? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 19:19, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I ask myself this every time... LOL. She says that she wants to do good films, but then turns them down when she's offered them. Quite literally "a bundle of contradictions". BTW, I don't think she was offered Queen; it's probably a bunch of hogwash. I think Vikas Bahl has said that Kangana was his only choice. With Black, it was due to Mr. Bachchan; after Abhishek and Karisma broke off their engagement things weren't too good with the family. As for the rest, she was probably smoking something when those films were offered to her. LOL --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 15:15, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Apparently, Salman wasn't given the Best Debut award at Filmfare for Maine Pyaar Kiya; take a look at the source provided. What are your thoughts? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 15:25, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * No idea... User:Rajeshbieee had added it! --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 17:45, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Rajeshbieee (talk) 21:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)::: See, Salman was never given the award for the best debut male ( it was called as Most sensational debut at that time ) and the award was given to Sooraj Barjatya instead. Filmfare said that Salman has already done a film earlier ( Biwi Ho to Aisi ), so the debut award cannot be given to him, ( eventhough the award title is "most sensational debut", which is infact Salman only ). But Filmfare forgot to explain why Aamir Khan was given the same award for QSQT one year earlier, eventhough he has appeared in Ketan Mehta's Holi earlier.
 * The decision of Filmfare infact created a controversy and they never gave the right explanation on this, moreover in future issues on Awards special, nothing was mentioned on this. But after 14-15 years, Filmfare presented an award to Salman ( not in any function ) for Best debut 1989. This was printed as a 2 column small article with Salman's photo also updated. Most of the people do not know about this issue and you people would have believed it now as the youtube video provided revealed the "truth". Its we people's job ( editor's ) to update information truthfully and neutrally. Additionally all the filmfare awards section ( in wikipedia ) is wrong as it has given wrong year. eg: For a film released in 2009, the award should be mentioned as 2009 only and not "Award for 2010". The award was "practically" handed over to the person in the next year only, but that does n't mean that the award is given for the next year.

Rajeshbieee (talk) 21:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

RE:Rani Mukerji filmography
Hello. I reviewed Rani Mukerji filmography regarding featured list status and the list looks meticulously done. Bravo. If you don't mind, could you proofread 85th Academy Awards for featured list status? I would appreciate the help. Thanks.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 20:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

RE:A barnstar for you!
Thank you very much! I think since Wikipedia is one of the websites that pop up in most people's searches and since the Academy Awards are a hallmark of pop culture (regardless of what anyone thinks), I believe that the Oscars deserves fair, comprehensive, unbiased, and subjective coverage here so that at least the media who do look up on this website at least know that they are getting somewhat reliable material.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 02:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

still not on any solid ground
This source isnt any better. All it does is give the arbitrary verdict "semi hit". (and wtf is a "semi hit"? - even BOI cannot even give you a valid answer for what they mean by any "verdict" rating as they give "semi hit" ratings to films that have greater box office nett and gross than to films they give the supposedly higher "hit" rating too)

Please provide a real source that actually supports the claims that you are attempting to present.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  13:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I think you should take your grievances to Box Office India and not my talk page. I don't give a fuck what you think of it. It's considered a WP:RS and I have included it. If you have issues, discuss on talk page. Meanwhile take a chill pill! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  13:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Krimuk, you are 100% correct and I support everything you say. But your cursing of TRPoD can lead to you bring mercilessly blocked, and I do not want to see that happening. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:29, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks Kailash. But I did not not curse or use any personal attacks against him. As for the use of the word "fuck", WP:Wikipedia is not censored. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  01:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * While it's certainly not a personal attack, the policy that is quoted above is noway connected to the current scenario :) &mdash; Vensatry (Ping) 08:38, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Haha, okay, but I don't think it's wrong to use 'fuck' while describing my state of mind. Anyway, I really don't do personal attacks, it's too last season! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  11:13, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * True, as I was saying earlier. Otherwise, we shouldn't be having this essay! &mdash; Vensatry (Ping) 15:22, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * LOL! Nice one!-- KRIMUK  90  ✉  15:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Edit on Vidya Balan
But the Padma Shri award is the biggest civilian award which she has received which is different from the others which she has received. The awards page mostly deals with film awards.--Mohit Singh (talk) 16:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi! It sure is, but as I said in the edit summary, the inclusion of the image clutters the page unnecessarily. Also, the awards page is for all her awards, and not just film awards.-- KRIMUK  90  ✉  16:42, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Kangana Ranaut, roles and awards
Thanks from  → Call me  Hahc  21 ) 08:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Main Tera Hero
Hey sorry i didn't know that we can't repeat a critic review. about this? Daan0001 (talk) 13:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi! No need to apologise. It's good to have reviews from different critics when there are so many of them, especially for two consecutive releases. Cheers! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  13:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thats ok. Also i have removed Dabboo Ratnani calendar info from alia bhatt page since u removed it from varun dhawan page. Don't really know whats the reason u removed itDaan0001 (talk) 13:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It's not an important information to be included in their biography. All Bollywood celebrities feature in calender photoshoots. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Shraddha Kapoor dob
Is she a 1987 born? Most sources claim the year to be 1992. And, congrats for Rani Mukherji filmography :) &mdash; Vensatry (Ping) 03:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you. :) Shraddha's DOB is baffling because there are sources that mention 1987, 1989, and 1992. We decided to use Femina as our source because they did a long piece on her and should have gotten her birthday right. What do you think? -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  03:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I thought we should always go by what majority of the reliable sources say. Femina? it seems like a dubious source; if that's an offline source we need more parameters to AGF. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping) 06:49, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * There was a discussion over this here. Maybe you can discuss this with the user who initially added 1987 as her birth year. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  08:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Heyy, heyy. Sorry, I'm interrupting..but I would have thought this source would be the most reliable "guess" for her age, since the interviewer directly says "you're 24" (in Apr 2013), and she doesn't correct her.. AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 10:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't mind if we all agree to go with that. Or perhaps, leave a footnote like Katrina Kaif's article. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

What is your next project
after Kangana Ranaut? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 22:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Can't believe that I didn't even notice your reply. My bad! LOL. Anyways, I would love to work with you on Aamir Khan! :) BTW, how early can you nominate an article to feature as TFA? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 19:42, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * What I meant was suppose we wanted an article to feature as TFA in September when can we start the nomination process? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 17:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I mean, I would really appreciate if someone could try taking Alam Ara to GA status, but I can't as I cannot find much online sources. Krimuk, would you consider that among your next projects? Kailash29792 (talk) 17:55, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Alam Ara would be a great one to do, agreed! Everything alright Smaro? -you've been rather quiet of late, I guess you tired of me asking if you'd seen films you hadn't seen :-)♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * LOL!! Just on vacation guys! Will look into it when I am back. :) :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  06:38, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

2007 Oscars
Hello there,

I don't know if you are busy or not, but would you please kindly proofread 79th Academy Awards for featured list promotion? I would greatly appreciate the help.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 03:16, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure, will do so in the next couple of days. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  06:06, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Heyy!
Am I allowed to give my comments/support here or do I have to be an administrator or something? AB01 '' I'M A POTATO 05:25, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * You can definitely comment there. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  06:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! I will be expanding the list in the next couple of days. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  09:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Madonna filmography
Krimuk, will you lend your eyes on this nomination? You can be as critical as you want to be. :) — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 17:53, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey! I am on vacation now. Will post in the next couple of days. Cheers! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  06:37, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure buddy, will wait for your comments. :) — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 14:04, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi buddy, did you get a chance to look at this request? — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 06:09, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Oops, so sorry. Will comment now. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  06:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Congrats!

 * I love Olaf! Thank you so much buddy! -- KRIMUK  90   ✉  06:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at Category talk:Filmographies
Hi Krimuk90. There is currently a discussion over at Category talk:Filmographies on four article titles that in the format of "[name], roles and awards", and whether they are appropriate for Wikipedia. As the creator of one of the these articles, I'm sure that everyone would appreciate and be keen to hear your thoughts on the matter. Just wanted to bring the discussion to your attention. Thanks very much! A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 15:19, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hey
@smarojit- How are you? Excellent work on Kangana's article, its Perfectly written. After a year long, I got a chance to work on the Rai's page today. I just want to inform you that I made a small change in the lead. We discussed about the summary change. Would you pls come up with a statement for the below? Also, Can we mention her Hollywood debut in lead section? Thanks for your help as always.

"We need to include a line about her work in "independent films" (a better word than offbeat, perhaps) and the fact that she has received acclaim for her dancing skills".

Ssg2442 (talk) 08:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks! :) I'll take a look at it. -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  11:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

2003 Oscars
Hello there,

I am ready to submit another list for promotion now that my finals are done and it's my birthday on May 21. I don't know if you are busy or not, but would you please kindly proofread 75th Academy Awards for featured list promotion? I would greatly appreciate the help.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 03:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Happy birthday buddy. I'll definitely comment there soon. -- KRIMUK  90   ✉  07:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

SRK
Ok, that makes sense. In the future, explain your reverts in the edit summary (especially when the other person has done so) instead of being condescending and implying an ownership of the article. It'll save you a lot of grief and potential edit warring.—indopug (talk) 11:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Another
Take a look at this list. Most of the part is not sourced. And I'm sorry I haven't noticed that you are an expert of Bollywood and India related things. Cheers,  J i m Carter  ( talk ) 10:49, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Haha, I am no expert, I was just providing my opinion on the fact that the article needs a lot more work. The awards and nominations list is not a very good one. Check out Shahrukh Khan filmography that I recently expanded, and nominated for FL. All claims must be cited with a WP:RS. And WP:OVERLINK doesn't apply to removing links for film titles, but applies to linking common English words and linking the same thing more than once. Again, I really appreciate the work you were doing on Khan's article, but I just don't think it's ready for GA yet. I hope we can collaborate on an article in the future. Cheers! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  14:11, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmm I have seen that article. Just found it on your user page. Though I'm not much familiar with Bollywood related article. Actually Khan is my fav Indian actor for his film Jaab tak hain jaan. So I thought of improving his article here. Anyway, happy editing!   J i m Carter  ( talk ) 06:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Co-nomination
I was really working hard on the article, List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan. I tried to take the article towards FL but I failed as I am not well aware of Wikipedia and it's policy. I don't know as I saw the article was perfectly fine for FL but it needs an eye of an expert especially the one that is also interested towards the articles that I'm/was working on. I'd really appreciate it if you join me as a co-nominator for the next nomination (which will pass hopefully). Looking forward to your reply, thanks.-- FrankBoy (Buzz) 20:52, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi. Thanks for the message. I'll have a look at the list soon. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  09:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * This is a tricky one! If you see Featured lists, there aren't any featured listings of the awards received by an actor. I presume this is because the list will remain an incomplete one. I wish you all the best with this one, but I must politely decline your offer. Do let me know if you need help with any other article. Cheers! -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  04:04, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I do know there aren't any listings of awards received by an actor but at least there are listings of awards received by an artist or article that starts with "List of awards and nominations received by..." in the list. Okay as you wish, thank you anyway.-- FrankBoy (Buzz) 08:04, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

FYI
User_talk:IndianBio. -- Neil N  talk to me  12:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Help for GA
Hi Krimuk, I need your help. Actually i want to make a GA class article of television actors, but i don't know about correct Manual of Style (MOS) of Filmography and Awards table, Lead, Infobox, Sections, etc...


 * Table style for Filmography and Awards


 * Lead section


 * Career
 * Personal life
 * Early life
 * or


 * Personal life
 * Career
 * Early life
 * or


 * Early life
 * Personal life
 * Career

References is really need if the content is verified in Personal info section or other sections? because, as far as i know BLP article's infobox should be verified, So
 * References in infobox


 * or

Please reply here or on my talkpage and mark✅ the correct content. 101.60.186.89 (talk) 11:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi. I think you will find all your answers on this project page. Good luck! :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  07:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Comments please!
Hey Krimuk, I'm here to request you to give your precious time to WP:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan/archive3. Please do comment whenever you get time to, thanks.— FrankBoy (Buzz) 10:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kangana Ranaut
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kangana Ranaut you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 09:20, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kangana Ranaut
The article Kangana Ranaut you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kangana Ranaut for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 11:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you. :) -- KRIMUK  90  ✉  11:05, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Complaint about your edits at WP:AN3
Please see Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. You may respond there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 13:32, 5 June 2014 (UTC)