User talk:Kris Grant

September 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Sam & Cat episodes, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. All info about unaired episodes requires references Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Baby Daddy episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 03:23, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Liv and Maddie episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Provide references for all viewing info and all info about unaired episodes. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn. As before Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:24, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Since you refuse to provide references as requested and required for future episode and viewing data, I must presume that you don't actually have a source for the info you are adding - invention perhaps? Or you are refusing to comply with that requirement for some other reason. Either way this is disruptive and forces others to clean up the not valid info you have added. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)


 * So there is no mistake that it's not only one user who is opposing your edits, I too find them disruptive, and if you make another edit of this sort without a reference, it will be referred to admins as vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)


 * And yet again with with this edit to List of Jessie episodes. Helpful edits are appreciated but continuing to add content that does not comply with wiki requirements for being verifiable, and a refusal to communicate and heed instructional messages and warnings indicates that you don't really have any intention of contributing in a useful manner. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:23, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Repeated addition of unreferenced data. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ron h jones (Talk) 16:41, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Girl Meets World. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Comparisons must be backed up with references Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:34, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The_Legend_of_Korra_(season_4). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Provide references for all viewing info and all info about unaired episodes. 208.46.217.202 (talk) 22:40, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Every Witch Way episodes. Dcbanners (talk) 11:44, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mickey Mouse (TV series). Dcbanners (talk) 23:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of See Dad Run episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 21:17, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Widr (talk) 23:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Dog with a Blog episodes. Dcbanners (talk) 22:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 23:29, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm Dcbanners. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Every Witch Way episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dcbanners (talk) 20:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Dog with a Blog episodes. As before Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:44, 17 January 2015.

Sorry, I'm trying to help this Wikipedia. Kris Grant (talk). (UTC)


 * You cannot add data unless you have a reference for it. Anything else is WP:OR and will be removed on sight. Ron h jones (Talk) 03:09, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 Months for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ron h jones (Talk) 20:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)