User talk:Krisfalusi

Pro-abortion vs pro-choice
Er ... with respect, what on earth is the distinction here? CJCurrie 22:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Pro-Abortion means that you think abortion should be legal and left up to a woman's sole discretion for any reason and without limitation as to term. All these things are OK with you: Sex-selection abortion, abortion because you are poor, second-trimester abortion for any reason, third trimester for genetic reasons, abortion-on-request, abortion even if done out of accordance with current law (Bennett), doctors should have to perform abortion, abortion for children without parental consent, abortion is a fundamental right. Pro-Choice ( in Canada -- our social movement differs from the US) thinks abortion should be legal and left to a woman's sole discretion, however it respects that doctors and women can each decide their participation, that some limits can be set to protect society, and it disagrees with some reasons that abortions are done (sex selection, multiple abortions because of failure of birth control). Pro-Life always views the abortion as the murder of a fetus and can accept abortion for medical, life-saving reasons only if the rights of a woman and her child are weighed in an equal balance. This describes the framing (social sciences) for the various Canadian Abortion views and Movements. Carolyn Bennett is pro-abortion has no problem with Canadian women calling up the NAF for counseling and referral, even if they get asked their race/ethnicity (that's against the law in Canada) and even if they don't get a referral in their city because though abortion is available -- yet there is no NAF clinic (that's promoting inequity in access to healthcare and her responsibility as MP to ensure equitable access). I live in her constituency and have questioned her on the NAF's role in Canada and she doesn't even respond.