User talk:Krish!/Archive 3

Help
I want the Hindi and Urdu pronunciation for Parineeti Chopra. Please, help me. Prashant  ✉  15:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The WP:Reference desk/Language is the best place to ask this question. Hope this helps --nonsense ferret  16:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: Priyanka Chopra
Hey! Glad to see you again. I am a bit busy now, but I'll try to take a look at your article :) — ΛΧΣ  21  16:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

PC prose
Give me an example of what you think would help please. There are already quotes from her about Fashion and Barfi; we don't want too many. I was told to remove some during the GA review. Seems you cannot please everybody, so the article swings back and forth from having too much to too little of different things. The main problem I see with the review is that no enough people are taking the time to review it. But they get upset if you spam them asking to look. I am afraid it's going to fail just because of lack of support. Currently there are 2 supports and 1 oppose; most reviews have more input than that, but it is up to the FA delegates to decide. If so, then it can be re-nominated at some point. BollyJeff &#124;  talk  16:18, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for spicing up the text. Let me know when you are done so I can fix a couple grammatical issues.  BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  12:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Waqt is about a dying man trying to teach his son some responsibility. I have not seen Hero.  Read the plot I guess.  BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  14:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Does every film have to have a description? I thought just the significant ones. Is that common among the other FAs? BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  15:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Barfi!
Hi Pks1142, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:05, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Done – feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Priyanka Chopra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:14, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

PC FAC
Hi Prashant. I am fine. Thank you. How are you my boy? Listen, I will comment on your FAC this weekend. If ever I forget, ping me on Monday. OK? Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 17:35, 13 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Good. Prashant, as I told you before, make your studies a priority. Don't spend hours on Wikipedia. Editing here won't pave the way to a brighter future for you. Having good results in your exams will. Please concentrate in your studies. Don't become addicted to Wikipedia. I am telling you all this while considering you as my younger bro. Please take my words into consideration when there is still time so that you do not regret anything later. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 17:50, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * That's a very useful advice, Prashant. Pay heed to it.--Dwaipayan (talk) 02:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Priyanka Chopra
Thank You very much for the help!. Prashant  talk  02:18, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Failed FAC
I am in no hurry to take it back to FAC, but if you are still enthusiastic (which I am not), then go right ahead. I will help where ever I can. BollyJeff &#124;  talk  12:47, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I would like to change the infobox picture to this one: because it is a more proper head-shot, and she doesn't normally wear red lipstick like in the current photo.  Are you okay with that?  It is not quite ready yet; there are still some permissions to put in place but it should be ready soon.  BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  18:17, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I changed the pic now. I just saw that you undid some of the copy editor's work in Artistry section. Is that wise? About the review, I can't do it now.  If its in the queue, someone will get to it eventually.  In the past, I have had to wait a long time, and I did not ask for a particular reviewer. That could look like you are trying to game the system by having your buddies give you an easy pass.  BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  12:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Due to the content, I think that "Acting style and analysis" would be more accurately titled "Role selection and analysis". What do you think? BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  18:34, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Parineeti Chopra

 * Thank You so much. Prashant  talk  09:32, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello
How were your exams? :) — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 03:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Good good, now off to making the Chopra sisters GA and FA eh? :)

Why?
PC was stable for a couple weeks, and now here you go again with massive changes. Why? Its like you really don't want it to succeed. You are adding bad grammar back in after a good copyedit. Why?!? Moving things around, and removing tons of sources. Why? No on ever said there are too many sources. What if one goes bad or is deemed unreliable? Now the backups are gone. I just don't get why you can't leave it alone!! BollyJeff &#124;  talk  14:53, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree with BollyJeff. You're ruining the article! Some of your edits don't even make any sense. I've told you this before and I'll say it again, let the experienced editors deal with the article. You're not qualified to take an article to FAC. I love what you've done with the Huma Qureshi article. You should stick to improving the start-class articles for now. Gleek Vampire  &#124;  talk!  19:07, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * So, you don't love what I have done to Chopra article. I made the article more readable, made prose more strong, removed unneeded details and sources. You say that I have no contribution to Chopra article? It seems funny to me as I have given my day and night to the article. I know better than others, what I have to. Thanks, for letting me know (that my contributions to Chopra article are waste of time). I'm responsible to the article was it is today (alongwith Bollyjeff), so please don't make me realize that I'm not experienced or anything like that. Prashant  talk  21:41, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Hahaha! More readable? Are you serious? Keep dreaming! Also, stop comparing yourself to BollyJeff. LOL Gleek Vampire  &#124;  talk!  01:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, Gleek, there is no need to pile on. He is doing a pretty good job overall, and I do overreact sometimes (although I did revert a couple of the edits for what I think are valid reasons). Also there is nothing special about me, but thanks for the support. BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  02:01, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, you have obviously done good work on the article; try to be a bit thicker of skin, it you know what I mean. BTW, I added the info on Apuroopam because a couple times now other editors have added incorrect info. If we address the issue with a valid source then maybe they will stop.  If you think I put it in the wrong place, then relocate it, but why remove it completely?  BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  13:49, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Haha, now you are telling me to keep it stable, after what you started. :-) BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  20:30, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination
Of course I will help, but I want to add my name to the nomination as was done in for example: Featured_article_candidates/Mother_India/archive1. BollyJeff &#124;  talk  11:40, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Hey, in the nomination reason I saw this: "She is one of the youngest actress to win National Film Award for Best Actress and the youngest actress to win the same in Hindi films". I don't remember this being in the article itself. Please add it with a source (the youngest part).  BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  13:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Looking at National Film Awards, there is only one best actress award; it is not broken up by language the way the films are. So this appears to be a false claim by Verve. I would not add it now. BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  14:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Chopra
Please see Bollyjeff's talk page where I started a discussion on the lead. A link to one of my sandboxes is there in that discussion. Please see the proposed lead there.--Dwaipayan (talk) 03:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC)


 * A well respected editor Dr. Blofeld is thinking it was too soon for the re-nomination, and if we are making big changes (like to the lead), perhaps he is right. BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  12:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)


 * On the lead, I don't think WYR deserves any special mention, and Dwaipayan wanted us to move the awards stuff out of the first paragraph. Anyway, I think maybe we should withdraw the nomination and let Dr. Blofeld help us out. Did you see that other editors are now questioning Kareena Kapoor's FAC status, after we worked so hard to make PC look like it. BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  18:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, what I don't want is to get to the stage where we are making significant changes and people start complaining about the article stability.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  18:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I made a couple mods there too. It looks good to me now.  Let's be patient and see what Blofeld says.  BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  20:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * It just sounds weird in the lead because you said that she had received critical and commercial success already, so how major could it have been? In the article body it is supported by proper context, but not so in the lead. Put it back if you want, and see what others say, but to me it is not needed there. BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  20:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, since it's not up for FAC anymore, if I was you, I would go ahead and put your sandbox version up there now. BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  22:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * No no; I think they were saying that someone was complaining of too many quotes on Kapoor, weren't they? Or are are you saying to paraphrase the quotes? In that case, its the same sources. BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  03:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

FAC
I'd Db-author it and you can renom as 2nd when Dwai and I have had time to look at it. Your choice.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  18:38, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Quickly replace the page with and remove it from the list. I'm looking at Hyderabad first but I'll look at Chopra afterwards in a day or two.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  18:57, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Give it a few minutes, sometimes takes up to an hour for an admin to delete.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  19:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC) What is WYR?19:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Per your request, I've deleted this nomination. Good luck with the renom, if and when. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:14, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks:) Prashant  talk  20:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

 * Do what you want! I am out of here. -- smaro jit  (buzz me)  07:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Prashant, you did very bad thing. Yes, your version of the lead was not entirely bad, but Smaro actually improved it significantly through his edits. The worst thing you did was such inflammatory comment in the edit summaries. Rather, you could have opined in the article or other users talk pages.
 * I just read the version edited by Smarojit. Undoubtedly, that version was the best so far we had. The pattern (chronology then characteristics) was good, and some good words were used. I would highly recommend that lead. Then, if you find some wrong in some words (such as album) just mention that in talk page, and the wrong will be corrected.--Dwaipayan (talk) 12:24, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Please let them do what they want, and then let's have a look later. Stop reverting!!! BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  19:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay Bollyjeff, now only this was left and you have perfected that. First, you told me my version was good, then told me to add and now.......great. What I'm fool or something or a joker? Tell me to not edit the article again. Prashant  talk  19:08, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Look, Smarojit has an FA to his credit, and neither of us do. He is trying to help, so please let him. If you are saying that now you do not want it to be FA, then you are showing your true colors; that of a fan only. Please stop with your hysterical behavior over this article. I have put more effort than you on it, and I am not going crazy over this am I? Just calm down; you do not own the article.  BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  19:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay....Now you are showing me the mirror? I'm showing my colors? I don't have an FA. I'll have one before ending my first year on this Wikipedia. I know you have put up a lot of work. But, what I was doing only reverting? That what you are saying? I am dying to take it to FA and I will always. But, with current lead it is going to be a rocky one. What if he has one FA, have you intrerfared in his work. Well, he is doing just to increase hid contributions number as he saw it as a future FA, so if it passes breaking news he gets his second FA. Do what you want but, dontmessage me again. Prashant  talk  19:49, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Priyanka Chopra
Thanks for your email, although I prefer keeping content disputes (and almost everything else) on-wiki. The article looks pretty good to me now; one issue I have with the Bollywood-starlet articles is that they tend to be fancrufty. While I remove peacock words when copyediting, WP:NPOV is the job of whoever adds the material, not the copyeditor. It seems like you're all working towards the same goal, which is FA; please read WP:OWN, and don't goad another editor into violating 3RR—that's been known to backfire. Good luck and all the best,  Mini  apolis  13:29, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks:) Prashant  talk  15:07, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Barfi! GA
Nice work on Barfi!, man. But you could atleast in form about the GA nomination. :/Plea$ant 1623  ✉  12:24, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry for that, But I was very busy to inform. I was looking at every single source. My fingers are tired and so am I. Well, a lot of work is left. Let me finish :) Prashant  talk  12:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Parineeti Chopra GA result
Parineeti Chopra article has passed, you can see comments etc at Talk:Parineeti Chopra/GA2. In addition, there is a backlog at WP:GAN, you can review an article too. Congrats on success! --Tito Dutta (contact) 18:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank You for the review. Prashant  talk  02:27, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Reply
Well, I was just saying that you should assume good faith to other editors. I tried to improve the article but then I realised that the article was in a so bad state that I needed more editors to improve the article, that's why I called Arjann and you. And I have been really busy these days, since my exams have ended, I went to a holiday so I had no time to open Wikipedia. Anyways, fingers crossed for the GA review and may the Force be with us!Plea$ant 1623  ✉  18:49, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Congrats
I saw your recent GAs; nice going. Looks like you are still working on Barfi! though. I noticed a lot of overlinking in the citations. We cleared it all up on Chopra, so I wonder why are you leaving it here? BollyJeff &#124;  talk  18:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * For example, every time there is a source with publisher=Box Office India . The square brackets are only needed on the first occurrence. BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  18:10, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh brother! So overlinking is encouraged in the sources, but not in the text?!? Did they show you a policy? BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  18:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, tell me where you get this action1oldid information? BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  18:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks:) Prashant  talk  14:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Yep, that was your work to take Barfi! to GA. But we both deserve credits because I helped it a lot before you came.Plea$ant 1623  ✉  15:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll mention your name. But don't so rude, because your're older than me!Plea$ant 1623  ✉  11:09, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

GOCE requests
Hi. I've undone your edit that replaced Madhubala with 7 Khoon Maaf on the GOCE Requests page, because Acabashi completed the request for Madhubala yesterday. I realise that he failed to indicate this on the page, but you need to keep track of your requests anyway. You can, of course, make a request for 7 Khoon Maaf, but it needs to take its proper place in the queue. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 10:10, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Its okay, I will place it at the bottom. I thought no one has grabbed that article. Prashant  talk  10:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 7 Khoon Maaf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imtiaz Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Reviews
Wow, you are suddenly very busy with your own GA noms and other GA reviews! I hope you have time to continue on KKHH. I am waiting. BollyJeff &#124;  talk  14:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * No, its not like that. I just logged in. Continuing right now. Prashant  talk  16:22, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the speedy review. BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  12:42, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Chopra
Hey! Just wanted to clarify that I started contributing to the Chopra article way before the GA nomination. I copy-edited the article and edited the column-writing, music career and public image sections (check the article history and the barnstars that I received for my work). You were the one who started editing the article after it passed GA. As for the review, I'll add more comments soon. Gleek Vampire &#124;  talk!  12:23, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fashion (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Arbaaz Khan and Siddhivinayak temple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

7 Khoon Maaf, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.