User talk:Krishnaa999

Welcome!
Hello, Krishnaa999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 13:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=606028041 your edit] to Yadav may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Yadav because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Fowler&amp;fowler «Talk»  13:37, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yadav. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Fowler&amp;fowler «Talk»  13:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Yadav, you may be blocked from editing. Fowler&amp;fowler «Talk»  13:42, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Yadav shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 14:10, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Caste warning
This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ahir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ahir was changed by Krishnaa999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924277 on 2014-04-28T12:37:17+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:37, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 13:10, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Krishnaa999 you appear to be what is known in Wikipedia as a caste warrior. As such, your next misstep may lead to an indefinite block. When your current block expires, please consider your options carefully. If you find yourself disagreeing with our current articles on caste there are reasonable steps you can take that won't get you in trouble. You can ask any experienced editor for advice. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm AdventurousSquirrel. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Yadav without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 05:07, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing on caste articles. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. See my warning above. Since you have resumed your unexplained removals of content at Yadav, you are now indefinitely blocked. Caste warriors are not welcome on Wikipedia. See WP:GS/Caste for the background. EdJohnston (talk) 05:15, 8 May 2014 (UTC)