User talk:Krishnachaitan

RE: adolf hitler health
Please post your message on Talk:Adolph Hitler, or type  here on your talk page and someone will help.

One more point: I don't mean to be insulting, but competence in English is required to edit the English Wikipedia. Perhaps you should consider editing in the Wikipedia for your native language. Sundayclose (talk) 16:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Problematic editing
What's this? Did you deliberately misrepresent a source so you could push in your edit? — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 09:54, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I've restored this comment for now; please answer this question. This appears to be the same kind of problematic edit that has triggered your previous blocks. Falsifying sources is absolutely unacceptable, and it would be a very good idea to address this issue.  Kuru   (talk)  17:00, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * As you've chosen not to respond, I've blocked this account. You seem to have tremendous difficulty in evaluating sources, or in making decisions in general. I can't seem to determine if this is a language fluency issue, a general competency issue, or intentional deceptiveness. Regardless, making false claims on biographies of living persons is not acceptable. I can also see cases of outright vandalism on the same articles.  You know the routine to appeal; you will need to comprehensively address the problematic edits.  Kuru   (talk)  13:12, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

His ideas are rejected for representation pseudoscience and pseudoarchaeology i believe this edit was right because the same information is used on Erich von Däniken article so what is the  big deal and do not block me from editing i will not do any wrong edits any more as you say
 * Erich von Däniken is explicitly mentioned no less than 10 times in that source, and specifically refers to his body of "work". To copy the reference to another article and claim it specifically addresses the subject's ideas is not accurate. There are likely ways to word what you're trying to get across, but you have to avoid synthesis. I'm sorry, but this is not the explanation that would make me comfortable unblocking you. "What is the big deal" is pretty conclusive that you're just not getting it, and "i will not do any wrong edits" is not the comprehensive answer I was looking for. Kuru   (talk)  13:44, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

ok this is this last time forgive me i will not do any more mistakes i'm sorry

Nomination of Unsealed: Conspiracy Files for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unsealed: Conspiracy Files is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unsealed: Conspiracy Files until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Finngall  talk  03:43, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Joseph stalin body lies in state.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joseph stalin body lies in state.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Krishna chaitan.jpg


The file File:Krishna chaitan.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Uploader states his father took the image, which means the uploader is not the copyright owner. Thus, non-free image which fails NFCC9."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HouseBlastertalk 17:07, 18 March 2022 (UTC)