User talk:Krishsundaram

Proposed deletion of BrowserStack


The article BrowserStack has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * There is just one independent source here, Scott Hanselman's blog. Rest is product documentation, sales, sponsorships that don't confer notability whatsoever. WP:GNG fail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianhe (talk) 22:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Editing the article to avoid any advocacy. Think BrowserStack is fairly notable within the developer community, and would ideally edit it to fit into [|this category]. --Krishsundaram (talk) 11:31, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 16:04, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines, as you did at BrowserStack. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Guy (Help!) 17:57, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with this issue of Conflict of Interest with the BrowserStack page. I received a notification by a user, Brianhe, saying the article was not adequately cited. So I went back and fixed that problem, and removed any content that remotely suggested advocacy. I am not sure why my user account has been blocked. Is it because I speedily addressed the problem that I am being accused of a conflict of interest?

I have not edited any other articles on Wikipedia, because I am really not qualified to add, remove or correct information. However, I am in that position with BrowserStack.

Krishsundaram (talk) 05:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Krishsundaram, the tag gets help from other editors not admins - to contest your ban you would need to follow the instructions on the block notice just above this section (i.e. using  ) as only admins can deal with blocking issues. KylieTastic (talk) 07:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi KylieTastic (talk). Thanks for the help. --Krishsundaram (talk) 08:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of BrowserStack for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BrowserStack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/BrowserStack& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. -- Wiki Linuz  ( talk ) 04:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)