User talk:Krisives

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Jan helfeld, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Talk:Jan helfeld was moved to Talk:Jan Helfeld by Krisives (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2010-03-24T23:14:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Search Engine Friendly


A tag has been placed on Search Engine Friendly, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Search Engine Friendly and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tomd2712 (talk) 06:05, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jan HelFeld Torres Settlement.pdf
Thank you for uploading File:Jan HelFeld Torres Settlement.pdf. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:41, 23 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi I do not know how to use Wikipedia that well. I actually contacted Jan directly and pointed him to this Wikipedia article, which he was completely unaware of. At the time it said he was the author of the article, and made the claim that his lawsuit was not real. After the phone conversation (which was odd, as we did not know each other and I was calling him "for Wikipedia" but not "as Wikipedia" and he didn't know what Wikipedia was) he faxed me the proof of settlement. He said I could post it onto Wikipedia under "a public domain license" where anyone on the internet could access it and republish it. Again I apologize if I did something wrong, I was trying to bring proof into what seemed to be a very non-neutral article at the time with no sources. Please let me know if I can do anything to help --Krisives (talk) 09:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)